2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time polymerase chain reaction shows that density centrifugation does not always remove Chlamydia trachomatis from human semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible infective organisms include chlamydia trachomatis, gardnerella vaginalis and ureaplasma urealyticum. A number of studies looked at the incidence of chlamydia positive semen of asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples (Gdoura et al, 2001(Gdoura et al, , 2007de Barbeyrac et al, 2006;Al-Mously et al, 2009). Positive results were considered to be indicative of current active infection.…”
Section: Known Medical Causes Of Male Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible infective organisms include chlamydia trachomatis, gardnerella vaginalis and ureaplasma urealyticum. A number of studies looked at the incidence of chlamydia positive semen of asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples (Gdoura et al, 2001(Gdoura et al, , 2007de Barbeyrac et al, 2006;Al-Mously et al, 2009). Positive results were considered to be indicative of current active infection.…”
Section: Known Medical Causes Of Male Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have specifically looked at the relationship between Chlamydial infection and semen quality. While some authors have shown that C. trachomatis infection is associated with poor semen quality [7][8], others have claimed that it does not [9][10]. Some reports indicated that C. trachomatis infection is associated with a decrease in sperm concentration and motility and also with altered semen pH and reduced volume of the ejaculate [11], [12], [13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…serology versus molecular methods); as well as variable and sometimes inadequate methods to assess semen quality. More recent studies (Hosseinzadeh et al, 2004;Bezold et al, 2007;Al-Mously et al, 2009), using molecular methods to detect infection, and robust methods of laboratory andrology to examine semen, have generally found that men with a current infection of C. trachomatis have poorer quality ejaculates compared than men who do not. It is unclear whether this is because of reduced levels of spermatogenesis in the presence of the bacterium, or whether infection causes an altered ejaculatory response.…”
Section: Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%