2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2021.3118075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Reachable Set Control for Neutral Singular Markov Jump Systems With Mixed Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 3 (see the works of Zhang et al 40,41 ). Suppose (Φ − 1)(K − 1) = 1, where Φ > 1 and K > 1, then for ∀𝜉 ∈ R n , ∀𝜙 ∈ R n and 𝜔, the following inequality holds…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of Adrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lemma 3 (see the works of Zhang et al 40,41 ). Suppose (Φ − 1)(K − 1) = 1, where Φ > 1 and K > 1, then for ∀𝜉 ∈ R n , ∀𝜙 ∈ R n and 𝜔, the following inequality holds…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of Adrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1. Consider the closed-system formed of the nonlinear multi-agent system (1), the funnel control (7), the event-triggered control strategy (41), the virtual laws ( 19), ( 26), (33), and (40). Suppose that Assumptions 1-3 hold, then, all signals of the considered system are bounded, and the tracking error can converge within a neighborhood around the origin by choosing appropriate design parameters.…”
Section: Tracking Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of desired control scheme has a strong robustness and anti-interference capability, which is necessary to guarantee the work safety for the target system with a combination of both theoretical and practical significance. Therefore, the issue of the RSS associated with different systems has attracted many attention of scholars in the past decades, such as neural network systems, 34,35 singular systems, 31,36 time-delay systems, 37,38 and switched systems. 39,40 Besides, the article 41 investigates the RSS issue of MJSs with time-varying delays subject to the hidden Markov model (HMM) and general transition probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this mode could transmit control signals to the actuator in real‐time, it is likely to lead to excessive consumptions of both communication and computation resources 34‐39 . Different from the time‐triggered control, the event‐triggered control determines online when to communicate by a triggered mechanism, updating the values of control inputs only if the deviation between the current state and the desired state exceeds a predefined threshold 40‐44 . In this sense, the event‐triggered control is more advantageous in communication efficiency and has been employed for improving control law design of fractional‐order nonlinear systems 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36][37][38][39] Different from the time-triggered control, the event-triggered control determines online when to communicate by a triggered mechanism, updating the values of control inputs only if the deviation between the current state and the desired state exceeds a predefined threshold. [40][41][42][43][44] In this sense, the event-triggered control is more advantageous in communication efficiency and has been employed for improving control law design of fractional-order nonlinear systems. 45 Note that, most event-triggered control approaches are based on static threshold conditions, being set as a predefined constant, which cannot reach requirements in certain practical cases particularly while the current state deviates the desired state considerably in short periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%