2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02533-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay Panel for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
194
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
194
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current diagnostic tests for coronavirus include RT‐PCR, real‐time reverse transcription PCR (rRT‐PCR), reverse transcription loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (RT‐LAMP), as well as real‐time RT‐LAMP 51,55–58 …”
Section: Coronavirus and Its Diagnostic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current diagnostic tests for coronavirus include RT‐PCR, real‐time reverse transcription PCR (rRT‐PCR), reverse transcription loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (RT‐LAMP), as well as real‐time RT‐LAMP 51,55–58 …”
Section: Coronavirus and Its Diagnostic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This detection is performed by targeting regions upstream of the E gene (upE) or within open reading frame (ORF)1b, using upE for screening and ORF1b for confirmation (42). Another real-time RT-PCR assay targeting the MERS-CoV nucleocapsid protein gene was developed and can be used for screening and confirmation (43). When there are discordant results between two real-time RT-PCR assays, the sequencing of an amplicon generated from an appropriate RT-PCR assay should be performed to confirm the test results (44).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results submitted for synthetic specimens J and K were not scored, as participants were likely to obtain varying results depending on the gene region and PCR marker used by the testing laboratory. In particular, participants performing MERS‐CoV‐specific testing according to the assay developed by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC) would expect a negative result for specimen J, as this assay targets a region of the N gene that is different to the region that was used to design the in vitro RNA transcript included in specimen J . These specimens were included as they could provide interesting information in regard to how participating laboratories handle equivocal test results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%