2015
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2015.20.43.30050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines in children, Australia, 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCA method has been also used based on an alternative data sources other than EHRs. For example, in the UK, H1N1 vaccine was monitored using passive surveillance data,69 and in Australia seasonal influenza vaccines have been monitored since 2015, based on data collected directly from consumers using SMS-messaging and email (AusVaxSafety) 70…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCA method has been also used based on an alternative data sources other than EHRs. For example, in the UK, H1N1 vaccine was monitored using passive surveillance data,69 and in Australia seasonal influenza vaccines have been monitored since 2015, based on data collected directly from consumers using SMS-messaging and email (AusVaxSafety) 70…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific target-group restrictions may also hinder detection of unanticipated signal events. For example, Australian short message service (SMS)-stimulated reactogenicity reporting surveillance systems [24] primarily target the paediatric population and so could not inform on this predominantly adult event. An increasing number of statistical signal detection methodologies have been described, but most studies demonstrate the methodological utility retrospectively and few describe the evolution of a signal detection and investigation in real time as we describe [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIR CUSUM control charts track the log-likelihood ratios of an observed cumulative event rate at a maximum acceptable level versus an expected level 14. Expected and maximum acceptable rates are set at the start of each influenza vaccination season based on a synthesis of clinical trial data and surveillance data from previous influenza seasons 12 13 15. For children aged 6 months to <5 years the expected MA rate in 2018 was set at 1%, while the expected fever rate was set at 3%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs on a weekly basis for influenza vaccines, thus facilitating rapid appropriate action in the event of any safety signals 11. AusVaxSafety has verified the safety of seasonal influenza vaccines administered to Australian children 6 months to <5 years of age since 2014, and to individuals of all ages since 2017, within weeks of the roll-out of vaccination programmes 9–13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%