SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018 2018
DOI: 10.1190/segam2018-2997303.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time seismic-image interpretation via deconvolutional neural network

Abstract: Seismic interpretation is now serving as a fundamental tool for depicting subsurface geology and assisting activities in various domains, such as environmental engineering and petroleum exploration. In the past decades, a number of computer-aided tools have been developed for speeding the interpretation process and improving the interpretation accuracy. However, most of the existing interpretation techniques are designed for interpreting a certain seismic feature (e.g., faults and salt domes) in a seismic sect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few recent papers have illustrated the successful application of deconvolution networks for seismic interpretation applications (Alaudah et al, 2018;Di et al, 2018). Figure 7 illustrates the architecture of the deconvolution network used for both of our baseline models.…”
Section: Deconvolution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few recent papers have illustrated the successful application of deconvolution networks for seismic interpretation applications (Alaudah et al, 2018;Di et al, 2018). Figure 7 illustrates the architecture of the deconvolution network used for both of our baseline models.…”
Section: Deconvolution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been great interest in using fully-supervised deep learning models for seismic interpretation tasks such as facies classification (Shi et al, 2018;Dramsch and Lüthje, 2018;Waldeland and Solberg, 2017;Araya-Polo et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2017;Zhao, 2018;Di et al, 2018;Rutherford Ildstad and Bormann, 2017). Typically, deep learning models -such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) -have millions of free parameters, and therefore require a large amount of annotated training data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivated by good results in many areas, CNNs are becoming researchers' default choice for the segmentation of seismic images and identification of salt deposits. A huge number of papers [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] in 2018 and 2019 supports the claim. Dramsch and Lüthje [34] evaluated several classification deep CNNs with transfer learning to identify nine different seismic textures from 65 × 65 pixel patches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Dramsch and Lüthje [34] evaluated several classification deep CNNs with transfer learning to identify nine different seismic textures from 65 × 65 pixel patches. Di et al [35] addressed the same problem using a deconvolutional neural network with three convolutional and three deconvolutional layers to speedup seismic interpretation. The same authors [36] addressed a problem of salt body delineation using a classification approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%