Real-time structured light intraoral 3D measurement pipeline

Gheorghe, Radu; Tchouprakov, Andrei; Sokolov, R. V.

doi:10.1117/12.2005289

SPIE Proceedings

2013

DOI: 10.1117/12.2005289

|View full text |Cite

Real-time structured light intraoral 3D measurement pipeline

Radu Gheorghe

Andrei Tchouprakov

R. V. Sokolov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Several factors related to the scanner technology, scanning strategies, scanning environment, operator and patient related factors, scan body material and geometry, implant location, and orientation have been identified to inherently limit the optimal functioning of the scanner and influence the accuracy of the impression. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Currently, digital impressions obtained using IOS show greater accuracy in cases of short edentulous spans and inter implant distance and are recommended for single implant restorations. 4 Various factors govern optimal planning and ultimate positioning of an implant intraorally that range from restorative, esthetic, or surgical factors.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Intraoral scanners (IOS) are noncontact scanners that rely on optical principles to three‐dimensionally (3D) map intraoral structures accurately 1 . Several factors related to the scanner technology, scanning strategies, scanning environment, operator and patient related factors, scan body material and geometry, implant location, and orientation have been identified to inherently limit the optimal functioning of the scanner and influence the accuracy of the impression 2–15 . Currently, digital impressions obtained using IOS show greater accuracy in cases of short edentulous spans and inter implant distance and are recommended for single implant restorations 4 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

Sequeira

Harper

Lilly

et al. 2022

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Implants placed at variable depths may vary the amount of visible scannable surface of a scan body. Intraoral scanner technology uses advanced optical principles to record the surface of the scan body to accurately capture the implant position. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect implant placement depth has on the accuracy of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner. Materials and methods A partially edentulous gypsum master model was fabricated to allow the positioning of a single implant analog at different depths. Four groups were created based on the planned implant depths of 7, 6, 3, and 0 mm and corresponding visibility of the scan body at 2, 3, 6, and 9 mm. The model was digitized with a laboratory scanner for the reference scan and with an intraoral scanner to generate 15 test scans per group, with a total of 60 scans. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan using the best fit algorithm to analyze and measure the positional (dXYZ) and angular deviation (d⍬) of the scan body using three‐dimensional metrology software. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was done with a Tukey‐Kramer HSD test (α = 0.05). Results The one‐way ANOVA of the groups for the dXYZ and dθ parameters was statistically significant (F3,56 = 11.45, p < 0.001, F3,56 = 24.04, p < 0.001). Group D (9 mm) showed the least positional deviation at 38.41 μm (95% CI 30.26; 46.56) and the least angular deviation of 0.17° (95% CI 0.12; 0.21). Group A (2 mm) showed the greatest positional deviation of 77.17 μm (95% CI 65.23; 89.11) and greatest angular deviation of 0.84° (95% CI 0.65; 1.03). The positional and angular deviation increased with increased implant depth. Conclusions The accuracy of digital impressions is influenced by the implant depth and the amount of visibility of the scan body. The trueness and precision are highest when the implant is placed at 0 mm depth with complete visibility of the scan body and decreases with subgingival implant placement.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

Sequeira

Harper

Lilly

et al. 2022

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Real-time structured light intraoral 3D measurement pipeline

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About