2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35409-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Support for Online Controller Supervision and Optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different theoretical works deal with the verification of stability in systems with any desired switching processes (Lygeros et al, 2003). In the simple case of a switch to a robust controller, stability can be maintained with the help of condition monitoring (Deppe and Oberschelp, 2000). If, however, the operating points of the controllers are not identical it will be necessary to cross-fade between the two controllers.…”
Section: Modeling Reconfigurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different theoretical works deal with the verification of stability in systems with any desired switching processes (Lygeros et al, 2003). In the simple case of a switch to a robust controller, stability can be maintained with the help of condition monitoring (Deppe and Oberschelp, 2000). If, however, the operating points of the controllers are not identical it will be necessary to cross-fade between the two controllers.…”
Section: Modeling Reconfigurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different theoretical works deal with the verification of stability in systems with any desired switching processes (Lygeros et al, 2003). In the simple case of a switch to a robust controller, stability can be maintained with the help of condition monitoring (Deppe and Oberschelp, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%