2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time suppression and amplification of frequency-specific neural activity using stimulation evoked oscillations

Abstract: Background: Approaches to predictably control neural oscillations are needed to understand their causal role in brain function in healthy or diseased states and to advance the development of neuromodulation therapies.Objective: We present a closed-loop neural control and optimization framework to actively suppress or amplify low-frequency neural oscillations observed in local field potentials in real-time by using electrical stimulation. The rationale behind this control approach and our working hypothesis is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that when the amplitude envelope of the spontaneous oscillations is constant over time, phase modulation (or locking) is sufficient to achieve optimal suppression or amplification of the targeted oscillations. However, the envelope of real in-vivo spontaneous oscillations is not constant over time (14, 11, 12). Our results show that adjustments in the stimulation pulse frequency and amplitude are needed to create precise destructive or constructive interference between stimulation-evoked responses and spontaneous oscillations whose amplitude envelope varies over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We showed that when the amplitude envelope of the spontaneous oscillations is constant over time, phase modulation (or locking) is sufficient to achieve optimal suppression or amplification of the targeted oscillations. However, the envelope of real in-vivo spontaneous oscillations is not constant over time (14, 11, 12). Our results show that adjustments in the stimulation pulse frequency and amplitude are needed to create precise destructive or constructive interference between stimulation-evoked responses and spontaneous oscillations whose amplitude envelope varies over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input x ( k ) = − 1 corresponds to stimulation pulse with the largest allowed amplitude and x ( k ) = 0 corresponds to the stimulation current that does not evoke a neural response. The values of the stimulation variable are negative or zero because the negative phase of the stimulation pulse (cathodal stimulation) was assumed to evoke the neural response (11). It is noteworthy that using the same modeling framework but with a change in the saturation limits one could also characterize evoked responses dominated by the anodal phase of the stimulus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others are accurate but TORTE require special hardware that is not easily maintained without dedicated engineering staff. They may be prohibited by high cost and may be difficult to implement into existing experimental protocols (Kanta et al, 2019;Rodriguez Rivero and Ditterich, 2021;Escobar Sanabria et al, 2020;Zrenner et al, 2018;Shirinpour et al, 2020). Many solutions are built atop proprietary, closed-source software such as MAT-LAB and its toolboxes (Hassan et al, 2020;Zelmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Difficulty In Creating Closed Loop Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and A.S. patent application WO/2020/183152), which we implemented as a digital circuit using the existing hardware of a commercially available recording system. Ordinarily, to produce such an online phase estimate the signal would be filtered with a pass band filter before a phase estimation step such as the Hilbert transform or the detection of zero crossings (Brittain et al, 2013;Cagnan et al, 2017;Escobar Sanabria et al, 2020;Kanta et al, 2019;Peles et al, 2020;Schreglmann et al, 2021;Siegle and Wilson, 2014;Takeuchi et al, 2021;Widge et al, 2018;Zanos et al, 2018). Such filters exhibit a filter delay, whereby the estimate at a given time point pertains to a fixed time in the past.…”
Section: Real-time Phase Tracking and Phase-locked Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%