2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Time-Dependent Nuclear−Electronic Orbital Approach: Dynamics beyond the Born–Oppenheimer Approximation

Abstract: The quantum mechanical treatment of both electrons and nuclei is crucial in nonadiabatic dynamical processes such as proton-coupled electron transfer. The nuclear−electronic orbital (NEO) method provides an elegant framework for including nuclear quantum effects beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. To enable the study of nonequilibrium properties, we derive and implement a real-time NEO (RT-NEO) approach based on time-dependent Hatree-Fock or density functional theory, in which the electronic and nuclear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach also neglects the nuclear quantum effects of the transferring protons. Alternative strategies using real-time time-dependent density functional theory 42 and its extension within the nuclear-electronic orbital (NEO) framework 43 to treat the transferring protons quantum mechanically, possibly on systems including the photosensitizer, would address these issues but are not yet applicable to these types of systems. Moreover, the times computed for proton transfer are not directly comparable to putative solution-phase experiments because the calculations are performed in the gas phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach also neglects the nuclear quantum effects of the transferring protons. Alternative strategies using real-time time-dependent density functional theory 42 and its extension within the nuclear-electronic orbital (NEO) framework 43 to treat the transferring protons quantum mechanically, possibly on systems including the photosensitizer, would address these issues but are not yet applicable to these types of systems. Moreover, the times computed for proton transfer are not directly comparable to putative solution-phase experiments because the calculations are performed in the gas phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Figure 4Excited-state intramolecular proton transfer in the oHBA molecule, where the transferring proton is treated quantum-mechanically on the same level as the electrons within the NEO framework. Adapted with permission from [38]. (Online version in colour.)
…”
Section: Numerical Atomistic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rather ingenious treatment allows the full machinery of electronic structure theory to be applied, natively accounting for electron and nuclear dynamics. Some of the methods already reported include HF, 24,25 many-body perturbation theory, [28][29][30] Configuration Interaction (CI), [31][32][33] density-matrix renormalization group, 34 multi-configuration self-consistent-field, 25 coupled cluster, 28,35,36 time dependent HF 37 and some explicitly correlated variants. [38][39][40] This framework cannot, however, be applied to the whole molecular system in a general manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%