1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)58016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Time Trajectory Generation for Differentially Flat Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the reverse channel of the human-UAV connection, we chose to provide haptic cues informative of how well the real UAVs, as a group, are executing the desired human commands (38). Recalling Sec.…”
Section: Case Of a Human Co-operator: Haptic Steeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the reverse channel of the human-UAV connection, we chose to provide haptic cues informative of how well the real UAVs, as a group, are executing the desired human commands (38). Recalling Sec.…”
Section: Case Of a Human Co-operator: Haptic Steeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As first haptic cue, we can then consider the mismatch between the commanded translational velocity ν and its actual execution by the UAVs. From (25) and (38) we have that, for each i-th UAV,…”
Section: Case Of a Human Co-operator: Haptic Steeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sufficient condition for the previous assumption is that the position of the centroid and the yaw angles are flat outputs [15], or, equivalently, that the UAV is dynamically feedback linearizable. It is well known that both helicopters and quadrotors meet this property [16], [17]. A description of the particular trajectory controller used to track the reference trajectory is outside the scope of this paper, as an example, we refer the reader to [18], [19] where related controllers for quadrotors are proposed.…”
Section: The Slave Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback linearization by static or dynamic state feedback is equivalent to differential flatness (Nieuwstadt and Murray, 1998). By solving (1a) for q m and differentiating twice we get the expression forq m as…”
Section: Feedback Linearization and Feedforward Control Of A Flexiblementioning
confidence: 99%