2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0239-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time travel-time prediction method applying multiple traffic observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four basic properties (FIFO, causality, reduction to static model, and With the development of location positioning technologies (such as GPS), floating car data with real geographic position and travel speed can be obtained in a relatively easy way. Existing applications generally utilise only the travel speed of vehicles for the estimation of congestion and travel times (Lim et al 2016;Tong et al 2013). However, modelling of dynamic traffic flows from pure and sparse observation data remains challenging (Arbués and Baños 2016) although video monitoring systems located at intersections can provide limited valuable information on dynamic traffic inflows (or outflows) onto (or off) a road.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four basic properties (FIFO, causality, reduction to static model, and With the development of location positioning technologies (such as GPS), floating car data with real geographic position and travel speed can be obtained in a relatively easy way. Existing applications generally utilise only the travel speed of vehicles for the estimation of congestion and travel times (Lim et al 2016;Tong et al 2013). However, modelling of dynamic traffic flows from pure and sparse observation data remains challenging (Arbués and Baños 2016) although video monitoring systems located at intersections can provide limited valuable information on dynamic traffic inflows (or outflows) onto (or off) a road.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-term traffic flow prediction models include nonlinear and linear models. Artificial neural networks, [12][13][14][15] k-nearest neighbors, [16][17][18] and the online support vector regression (SVR) 19 are nonlinear models, which belong to supervised machine learning methods that can learn some relationships between input and output, whose main disadvantage is that model training and parameter calibration need large data and time. Linear traffic flow prediction models include Kalman filtering 20,21 and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional studies concerning the estimation of traffic variables rely on statistical models or simulations and shallow machine learning approaches ( 6 8 ). For example, models that use the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) perform well for normal conditions based on the stationary assumption of the time series data, but it is difficult for them to reflect the non-stationary traffic data, especially the nonlinear relationships between traffic variables ( 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-parametric machine learning methods have been used extensively to overcome the nonlinear problems of statistical models (9,10). However, machine learning models, such as the support vector machine (SVM) and the k-nearest neighbor (KNN), require statistical assumptions to derive manually designed features (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%