Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2882903.2903743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Video Recommendation Exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our ssRec to two state-of-the-art baselines, CTT [17] and UCD [36]. CTT fuses collaborative filtering, type and temporal factor together to generate recommendation over streams.…”
Section: B Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare our ssRec to two state-of-the-art baselines, CTT [17] and UCD [36]. CTT fuses collaborative filtering, type and temporal factor together to generate recommendation over streams.…”
Section: B Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 1 illustrates the general framework for the KNN query over CPPse-index. Given an incoming social item v, our algorithm performs KNN query by three important steps: (1) compute the hash values based on the entity-category pairs contained in v, by which a set of extended signature trees are located (Lines 5-6); (2) generate pseudo-query based on the item and each located extended signature tree (Line 7); (3) select and rank the top-k relevant users (Lines [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. We maintain a max-heap U k with size k as our output ranked list.…”
Section: The Relevance Between Them Can Be Computed By Plugging Statimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collaborative filtering (CF) is widely used in recommender systems, which models user interests by exploring user-item interactions with the assumption that people with similar interests tend to make similar choices. For example, Huang et al [15] developed a realtime matrix factorization based CF algorithm with an adjustable online updating strategy for video recommendation. However, CF methods suffer from the problem of cold start and data sparsity [7,25,31].…”
Section: Video Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, different users have different interest groups and the interest groups of one user may also be diverse. However, existing methods commonly focus on learning the user interest representation directly from micro-video features without grouping [4,8,15,25]. In this way, the large groups with a majority of historical micro-videos dominate the user interests, and the micro-videos in small groups are rarely recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%