Real Work through Real Collegiality: faculty seniors views on the drive to improve learning and research

Harrison, Bernard; Brodeth, Esmeralda

doi:10.1080/1360080990210207

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers at higher educational level have emphasized improving administrative and management practices, teaching and research structures in universities (Cross, 2000;Fraser & Cheers, 2000;Harrison & Brodeth, 1999;Reponen, 1999;Sundberg, 2001). It has been argued that departments are the basic units to be transformed and there is a paucity of research on administering change at this level (Henkel, 2002;Smith, 2002).…”

Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

IJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

IJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

IJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A number of authors have also discussed collaboration under the guise of "collegiality." Harrison and Brodeth (1999) discussed the topic of collective ability to support one another in research under the term of collegiality to build a climate of trust and resilience in collegial research relations. Through the attention to collegiality issues, the need for communication and collaboration among researchers was increasingly acknowledged and has been discussed in the recent literature (Ayo & Fraser, 2008;Fraser & Ayo, 2007;Hatfield, 2006) as an effective approach for fostering a research community.…”

Section: Factors Influencing Research Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determinants and Perceived Outcomes of Tourism Research Collaboration

Zehrer¹,

Benckendorff²

2013

Tourism Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

in science, a phenomenon that he called "big science" (Price, 1965). Whereas research teams in the social sciences are not as large as those for major scientific projects, there has been an increasing tendency toward the formation of social and collegial relationships in the form of research coalitions and collaborations (Shrum, Chompalov, & Genuth, 2001). This trend toward collaboration is evidenced by an increasing number of coauthored publications and appears to be consistent across a range of Research collaboration has become increasingly common in the tourism field. Although there have been a number of studies on research collaboration, relatively little attention has been given to conceptualizing or measuring the determinants and outcomes of collaboration at an individual level. The purpose of this study is to propose a research collaboration model (structural equation modeling) that describes the drivers and perceived outcomes of collaboration. The article is based on a review of the relevant literature and an empirical Internet-based survey conducted with tourism researchers. Results show that collaboration is mainly driven by personal factors such as the need to increase one's efficiency to make progress more rapidly, to reduce isolation, and to gain travel opportunities. In terms of outcomes, there is a perception among tourism researchers that research collaboration improves quality, overall productivity, and esteem and visibility within the academic community. The study represents an initial attempt to conceptualize and measure research collaboration. Our interest is to offer a foundation for further research and encourage refinement and retesting of the model presented here.

show abstract

Real Work through Real Collegiality: faculty seniors views on the drive to improve learning and research

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

Determinants and Perceived Outcomes of Tourism Research Collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About