2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world clinical and cost analysis of CT coronary angiography and CT coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT)-guided care in the National Health Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a cost per patient encounter to reach treatment, regardless of what investigations are done), and if CTCA-first reduces layered testing then it may be cost-effective. 23 The proposed future vision to increase outpatient imaging service delivery within community diagnostic hubs (as proposed by the Richards report 24 ) may also enhance scanning capacity on a national level, as will the current drive to increase the number of CTCA reporters via amendments to both radiology and cardiology training curriculums. Additionally, a CTCA-first strategy would have improved adherence to NICE-CG95 6 whilst also reducing the time-to-diagnosis vs functional testing, which may miss non-obstructive CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a cost per patient encounter to reach treatment, regardless of what investigations are done), and if CTCA-first reduces layered testing then it may be cost-effective. 23 The proposed future vision to increase outpatient imaging service delivery within community diagnostic hubs (as proposed by the Richards report 24 ) may also enhance scanning capacity on a national level, as will the current drive to increase the number of CTCA reporters via amendments to both radiology and cardiology training curriculums. Additionally, a CTCA-first strategy would have improved adherence to NICE-CG95 6 whilst also reducing the time-to-diagnosis vs functional testing, which may miss non-obstructive CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML-based CT-FFR now enables such a workflow without the time or cost restraints applicable to earlier approaches [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] with the computation of CT-FFR on-site. However, our results demonstrate a false positive rate of 70% for CT-FFR in cCTA studies without morphological signs of obstructive CAD (no stenosis ≥50%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, CT-FFR has been proposed to mitigate the apparent challenges in reading cCTA, when serving as a guide to morphological coronary analysis, improving interpretation speed and reader confidence, particularly for less experienced readers [ 20 ]. However, commercially available off-site solutions to CT-FFR are impractical for this purpose, as they require several hours for processing and are also costly [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Newer approaches to CT-FFR, namely those based on machine learning (ML), are much less computationally demanding and can be calculated on site in just a few seconds [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFR-CT can be used as an alternative functional assessment tool concurrently with other non-invasive functional imaging tests. The use of FFR-CT can assist in avoiding unnecessary invasive coronary angiography 40,41 , however its true cost-effectiveness is still up for debate 42 .…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%