2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world clinical effectiveness of rituximab rescue therapy in patients with progressive rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, the optimal treatment strategy for such patients remains unknown, reflecting a paucity of randomized controlled clinical trials for this patient sub-group. Recently, observational data have suggested treatment with rituximab [6,15,16], and laterally abatacept [5,17] is the most effective and safest biologic agents for the treatment of RA with concurrent ILD or bronchiectasis. Data suggest that treatment with rituximab and abatacept may even infer a benefit to pulmonary function [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the optimal treatment strategy for such patients remains unknown, reflecting a paucity of randomized controlled clinical trials for this patient sub-group. Recently, observational data have suggested treatment with rituximab [6,15,16], and laterally abatacept [5,17] is the most effective and safest biologic agents for the treatment of RA with concurrent ILD or bronchiectasis. Data suggest that treatment with rituximab and abatacept may even infer a benefit to pulmonary function [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we were able to fulfill the main objective of the study, which was to report on the efficacy and safety profile of rituximab in different CTD-ILDs, showing the results in each of them separately. Lastly, despite there being no differences between the subgroups of patients treated with rituximab in terms of the primary endpoint of pulmonary outcome (p = 0.179), there was a greater number of patients with SS who presented progression compared to RA and IM [15,52]. However, the low number of cases included may not be sufficient to reveal significant differences between the groups, despite most studies to date being based on small retrospective observational studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, other authors reached contrasting conclusions, especially with respect to the efficacy of rituximab in ILD associated with other CTDs, and particularly with RA-ILD, given that survival in affected patients has been shown to be lower than in other CTD-ILDs [34,35]. A recent study [15] showed that rituximab can be effective as a rescue therapy in a considerable percentage of patients with progressive RA-ILD that does not respond to standard treatment. In our study, these differences were not statistically significant, despite the higher number of patients whose disease progressed or who died among those with RA treated with rituximab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, antifibrotic agents, such as nintedanib, could have a beneficial effect on the lungs of affected patients, as shown by the studies SENSCIS [27] and INBUILD [28]. In recent years, treatment with the immunosuppressants rituximab and abatacept has been reported to be safe and effective in ILD-SAI [29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%