2009
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.008078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world clinical experience with long-term miglustat maintenance therapy in type 1 Gaucher disease: the ZAGAL project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No AVN or bone fractures were reported during the 2-year observational period, and BMD Z-scores improved from baseline at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck at each time point (months 6, 12, and 24) [105]. A prospective open-label investigational study, which evaluated the therapy with miglustat 100 mg in patients with Type 1 GD, reported an improvement of bone marrow infiltration by 2.9 points measured by S-MRI score in 28 patients [106].…”
Section: Substrate Reduction Therapymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…No AVN or bone fractures were reported during the 2-year observational period, and BMD Z-scores improved from baseline at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck at each time point (months 6, 12, and 24) [105]. A prospective open-label investigational study, which evaluated the therapy with miglustat 100 mg in patients with Type 1 GD, reported an improvement of bone marrow infiltration by 2.9 points measured by S-MRI score in 28 patients [106].…”
Section: Substrate Reduction Therapymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These scoring systems, such as BMB or S-MRI [43][44][45], can be regarded as a good alternative to QCSI in daily routine [39,43]. Studies have shown an improvement in bone marrow involvement on ERT [46][47][48] and SRT [49] using either the BMB or S-MRI scoring system. Thus, these scoring systems are regarded to be beneficial in evaluating the extent of bone involvement of GD patients prior to therapy and during follow-up in order to quantify changes of bone involvement due to treatment.…”
Section: X-raymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Results regarding the effects of SRT on bone disease in GD1 are limited so far [49,79,81,82]. Similar to ERT, SRT also showed a positive effect on bone pain and bone crisis.…”
Section: Srtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations are in line with other studies showing that plasma chitotriosidase activity may increase in response to a treatment interruption [11][12][13][14][15] or a switch from treatment with ERT to substrate reduction therapy (SRT). 16 Previous studies have shown velaglucerase alfa to be effective and safe in treating therapy naïve patients [6][7][8][9][10] or after a switch from stable imiglucerase dose to an equal velaglucerase dose 6,7,10 Recently, Elstein et al 10 reported a socalled 'booster-effect' with velaglucerase alfa in patients who switched from long-term imiglucerase therapy. Their study concerned a different patient population as their patients who switched had either experienced an off-treatment period or an immediate switch at equal dose from imiglucerase to velaglucerase treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%