2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.1010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real World Data in Health Technology Assessments –Use of Routinely Collected Data to Address Epidemiologic Questions in Kidney Transplantation in the Amnog Process in Germany

Abstract: most effective antibiotics for treatment of Gram-negative isolates were Imipenem (74.74%), Piperacillin-sulbactam (75%), in addition to Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, and Meropenem that showed 100% sensitivity. Among Gram-negative microorganisms, Amoxicillin was highly efficacious (89%) followed by doxycycline (78%). Piperacillinsulbactam, Cefotaxime and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim showed 100% sensitivity against Candida albicans. ConClusions: The current study provides evidence that antibiotic prescription polici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study population constitutes one of the largest transplant collectives investigated during the pandemic and comprises about 30% of the estimated total number of kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in Germany (41,42). Regarding most patient characteristics, our collective is highly similar to other studies on long-term kidney transplant recipients in Germany and other countries (43,44). Despite its strengths, our study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study population constitutes one of the largest transplant collectives investigated during the pandemic and comprises about 30% of the estimated total number of kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in Germany (41,42). Regarding most patient characteristics, our collective is highly similar to other studies on long-term kidney transplant recipients in Germany and other countries (43,44). Despite its strengths, our study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…41,42 Regarding most patient characteristics our collective is highly similar to other studies on long-term kidney transplant recipients in Germany and other countries. 43,44 Despite its strengths, our study has several limitations. Our study investigates patients in a long-term situation after kidney transplantation during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In most instances, these examples were explicit about their rationale for incorporating unpublished data, primarily because the published data was sparse or lacked granularity (i.e., to increase certainty of findings by addressing strength of evidence), and/or to determine whether the published data were applicable to health system populations (i.e., to increase the certainty of findings by addressing the applicability of evidence). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] For example, we identified several times that the Mayo Clinic combined local health system data with systematically reviewed published data to support various clinical groups' patient care management decisions, that illustrate different reasons for combining unpublished local data and published data:…”
Section: Inform Strength Application or Implementation Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%