2019
DOI: 10.7150/jca.30292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-World Data on Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Abstract: Background : With the wide application of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), the survival of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM) has been significantly improved. However, prognosis analysis for patients with EGFR mutation and BM is still lacking, and the prognostic factors remain to be determined. Materials and methods : A total of 746 NSCLC patients with BM were identified between January 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 Related studies have proved that the use of upfront radiotherapy can improve OS and intracranial PFS (iPFS) in EGFR positive patients with brain metastases. 19 Because of the side effects of whole brain radiotherapy on neurocognitive function, most patients with EGFR mutations in this study were treated with EGFR-TKIs previously. After first-line or second-line treatment, salvage craniocerebral radiotherapy is considered only when the intracranial lesions progressed or accompanied with severe brain metastases symptoms, which may lead to the shortening of OS in EGFR positive patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 Related studies have proved that the use of upfront radiotherapy can improve OS and intracranial PFS (iPFS) in EGFR positive patients with brain metastases. 19 Because of the side effects of whole brain radiotherapy on neurocognitive function, most patients with EGFR mutations in this study were treated with EGFR-TKIs previously. After first-line or second-line treatment, salvage craniocerebral radiotherapy is considered only when the intracranial lesions progressed or accompanied with severe brain metastases symptoms, which may lead to the shortening of OS in EGFR positive patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a valuable independent predictor for the prognosis of NSCLC with BM, driver gene alteration has been incorporated into the prognosis assessment models that are widely used. 8,[13][14][15][16]20 In the adjusted Lung-molGPA model for adenocarcinoma, patients with Lung-molGPA scores of 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 had median OS of 18.4, 23.9, 35.5, and 49.0 months, which were longer than those obtained in the studies by Li, 15 Sperduto, 13 and Nieder. 14 The adjusted Lung-molGPA model estimates of the prognosis of adenocarcinoma with BM, both via whole (p = 0.000, C-index = 0.615) and adjacent stratification analyses (p = 0.012 for 0-1.0 vs 1.5-2.0, p = 0.000 for 1.5-2.0 vs 2.5-3.0 and p = 0.007 for 2.5-3.0 vs 3.5-4.0) were statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As a valuable independent predictor for the prognosis of NSCLC with BM, driver gene alteration has been incorporated into the prognosis assessment models that are widely used 8,13–16,20 . In the adjusted Lung‐molGPA model for adenocarcinoma, patients with Lung‐molGPA scores of 0‐1.0, 1.5‐2.0, 2.5‐3.0, and 3.5‐4.0 had median OS of 18.4, 23.9, 35.5, and 49.0 months, which were longer than those obtained in the studies by Li, 15 Sperduto, 13 and Nieder 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) suggests that brain MRI should only be recommended for patients diagnosed with stage II to IV and high-risk stage 1B nonsmall-cell lung cancer; no unanimous screening guidelines for identifying BM exists, until now (8,9). Previous studies found several risk and prognostic factors for BM, shedding light on methods to identify high-risk patients, predict survival, and conduct targeted therapy (10)(11)(12)(13). However, due to the relatively small sample size, the results were not consistent (7,14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%