2021
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.753653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-World Effectiveness of Inhalation Therapy Among Patients With Symptomatic COPD in China: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Abstract: Purpose: This real-world study evaluated the effectiveness of different inhalation therapies in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China and also explored the relevant factors that influence the effectiveness of inhalation therapy.Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective longitudinal study that was carried out in 12 hospitals in China from December 2016 to June 2021. A face-to-face interview was conducted to collect data. Baseline data were collected a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a similar responder rate of 49% was observed in a Chinese cohort, mainly including patients without prior inhalation treatment, who received either LAMA-monotherapy, dual-therapy consisting of LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA or multiple inhaler therapy with ICS+LABA+LAMA over a period of 6 months. 33 Our results were also comparable to the mean change of −2.8 points and a CAT responder rate of 47% in previously treated COPD patients who were escalated to a single-inhaler triple therapy containing a ICS/LABA/LAMA composition different from efSITT for 24 weeks in a previous observational study. 30 In an Austrian cohort, a mean decrease in the CAT total score by −7.2 points was observed with efSITT after 12 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, a similar responder rate of 49% was observed in a Chinese cohort, mainly including patients without prior inhalation treatment, who received either LAMA-monotherapy, dual-therapy consisting of LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA or multiple inhaler therapy with ICS+LABA+LAMA over a period of 6 months. 33 Our results were also comparable to the mean change of −2.8 points and a CAT responder rate of 47% in previously treated COPD patients who were escalated to a single-inhaler triple therapy containing a ICS/LABA/LAMA composition different from efSITT for 24 weeks in a previous observational study. 30 In an Austrian cohort, a mean decrease in the CAT total score by −7.2 points was observed with efSITT after 12 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although the efficacy and safety of a single-inhaler ICS/LABA/LAMA triple therapy was demonstrated in several randomized controlled trials, 2,3,[14][15][16]28,29 important issues of every day care such as patient adherence to therapy were rarely addressed. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Hence, our results contribute to address the gap between evidence from controlled trials and routine clinical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Inhalation drugs were the main treatment that could reduce symptoms and risk of exacerbation and mortality, as well as improve health status for stable COPD patients. Currently, LAMA, LABA + LAMA, LABA + ICS and LABA + LAMA + ICS were the top four inhalation drugs [18][19][20]. We have found that the low BMI patients had a poor treatment response, but which inhalation drugs would be better for low BMI patients was uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses on the effectiveness of single, double, or triple inhaled drugs has just focused on all patients with COPD rather than examining drug effectiveness according to the GOLD groups [ 16–17 ]. In addition, more symptomatic patients with COPD have accounted for the majority of the study populations [ 8 , 18 ], and studies have shown that more symptomatic patients with COPD treated with LABA + LAMA or LABA + LAMA + ICS are more likely to attain a minimum clinically important difference than patients treated with a LAMA [ 19 ]. In fact, in China, patients with COPD typically do not go to the hospital until they have severe respiratory symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%