2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02710-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world experience of erenumab in patients with chronic or episodic migraine in the UAE

Abstract: Background Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody and a highly potent, first-in-class calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor inhibitor approved for migraine prevention in adults. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials show that erenumab treatment results in clinically meaningful responses, including significant reductions in monthly migraine days. Real-world evidence of the effectiveness of erenumab in patients with migraine is accruing, but gaps remain, and findings may vary according … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, although our findings are overall in agreement with the results reported in the FRIEND study, a direct comparison cannot be done because of significant differences in the number of patients studied (67 vs. 204 in our study) and different medical histories and comorbidities. Moreover, we report similar findings to those recently published for erenumab [19][20][21] and galcanezumab [22,23] in real-world studies in both the EM and CM settings, although again methodological differences exist between studies, including the evaluation of changes in monthly migraine days (MMD) rather than MHD and the definition of the cut-off for treatment response at the level of 30% rather than 50% reduction in MHD. TA B L E 3 Changes in efficacy, disability, and quality of life outcomes at baseline (T0-trimester before initiation of therapy) and after fremanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine (n = 107).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nonetheless, although our findings are overall in agreement with the results reported in the FRIEND study, a direct comparison cannot be done because of significant differences in the number of patients studied (67 vs. 204 in our study) and different medical histories and comorbidities. Moreover, we report similar findings to those recently published for erenumab [19][20][21] and galcanezumab [22,23] in real-world studies in both the EM and CM settings, although again methodological differences exist between studies, including the evaluation of changes in monthly migraine days (MMD) rather than MHD and the definition of the cut-off for treatment response at the level of 30% rather than 50% reduction in MHD. TA B L E 3 Changes in efficacy, disability, and quality of life outcomes at baseline (T0-trimester before initiation of therapy) and after fremanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine (n = 107).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To our knowledge, this study represents the first real-world evidence study of intravenous migraine treatment and the first study examining the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous migraine medication among chronic and episodic migraine patients in the UAE. Similar to our study, other real-world data on other mAbs have validated our understanding of the effectiveness of these therapies [ 11 , 12 ]. Furthermore, the current study included diverse pools of patients in terms of their prior preventive therapies’ exposure in their treatment; the inclusion of naïve patients, as well as those with PPTF for migraine headache, allows for possible insights into how eptinezumab’s efficacy may be impacted by prior medication history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To our knowledge, this study represents the rst real-world evidence study of intravenous migraine treatment and the rst study examining the e cacy and tolerability of intravenous migraine medication among chronic and episodic migraine patients in the UAE. Similar to our study, other real-world data on other mAbs have validated our understanding of the effectiveness of these therapies [12,13]. Furthermore, the current study included diverse pools of patients in terms of their prior preventive therapies' exposure in their treatment; the inclusion of naïve patients, as well as those with PPTF for migraine headache allows for possible insights into how Eptinezumab-jjmr's e cacy may be impacted by prior medication history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%