2023
DOI: 10.1177/17588359231182386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated first line with a bevacizumab biosimilar (bevacizumab-awwb)

Abstract: Background: Bevacizumab-awwb (MVASI®) was the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to Avastin® (reference product [RP]) for the treatment of several different types of cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an indication approved based on extrapolation. Objectives: Evaluate treatment outcomes in mCRC patients who received first-line (1L) bevacizumab-awwb at treatment initiation or as continuing bevacizumab therapy (switched from RP). Design: A retrospective chart review … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 2023 study conducted by Jin et al 17 the experimental group had an average success rate of 87.6% compared with the control group's 71.4%. This represented the notable difference of 16.2%, indicating that the intervention had significant effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the 2023 study conducted by Jin et al 17 the experimental group had an average success rate of 87.6% compared with the control group's 71.4%. This represented the notable difference of 16.2%, indicating that the intervention had significant effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to efficacy and safety, duration of therapeutic effectiveness was of interest. In a number of studies, including those by Jin et al 17 and Saab et al 18 the experimental groups exhibited longer durations of efficacy. However, caution is required when interpreting these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations