2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world treatment drop-off among recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients: A US community oncology-based analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that nearly half of 1L-treated patients with r/mCC received 2L therapy is consistent with a recent study that followed patients with r/mCC from 2014 to 2020 in the US Oncology Network, reporting that 48 % of 1L-treated patients received 2L therapy ( Alholm et al, 2022 ). To our knowledge, these are the only two studies so far that estimated real-world receipt of 2L therapy and its predictors among contemporary patients with r/mCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our finding that nearly half of 1L-treated patients with r/mCC received 2L therapy is consistent with a recent study that followed patients with r/mCC from 2014 to 2020 in the US Oncology Network, reporting that 48 % of 1L-treated patients received 2L therapy ( Alholm et al, 2022 ). To our knowledge, these are the only two studies so far that estimated real-world receipt of 2L therapy and its predictors among contemporary patients with r/mCC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Doublet combination regimens of TV with bevacizumab, carboplatin, or pembrolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with advanced r/mCC in the dose-escalation phase. Treatment history was similar to the real-world population, 10,18,19 with the majority of patients having previous 1L bevacizumab 1 platinum doublet chemotherapy or previous chemoradiotherapy. Across arms A, B, and C, most AEs were grade 1/2 and no DLTs occurred with the TV-doublet combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…CC patients were identified as patients aged 18 years and above with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims with a diagnosis for malignant neoplasm of the cervix (identified by the International Classification of Diseases Codes 180.XX and C53.XX, where ‘X’ represents wildcard characters). We used a previously validated algorithm to identify r/mCC patients based on commencement of systemic treatment 18,19 . Briefly, patients with r/mCC were identified as CC patients who had ≥1 claim for systemic therapies included in guidelines for treatment of r/mCC on or after the first CC diagnosis date.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a previously validated algorithm to identify r/mCC patients based on commencement of systemic treatment. 18,19 Briefly, patients with r/mCC were identified as CC patients who had ≥1 claim for systemic therapies included in guidelines for treatment of r/mCC on or after the first CC diagnosis date. Therapies that included concomitant radiation therapy or surgery within 45 days were excluded as a line of therapy in the r/mCC setting.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%