2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-World Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cardinal clinical features of MM include anemia, hypercalcemia, renal impairmentand myeloma-related bone lesions [ 2 ]. The prognosis of MM patients has significantly improved over the past 15 years, mainly due to the incorporation of novel agents.However, it still remains an incurable disease and all patients will eventually relapse [ 3 ]. MM is considered a disease of the elderly, with a median onset age of 69 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cardinal clinical features of MM include anemia, hypercalcemia, renal impairmentand myeloma-related bone lesions [ 2 ]. The prognosis of MM patients has significantly improved over the past 15 years, mainly due to the incorporation of novel agents.However, it still remains an incurable disease and all patients will eventually relapse [ 3 ]. MM is considered a disease of the elderly, with a median onset age of 69 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While therapeutic advancements are made, MM patients continue to experience progressively shorter periods of remission followed by relapse, and their disease eventually becomes resistant to all available regimens, including PIs, IMiDs and mAbs [ 46 ]. Incorporating mAbs and new immunotherapeutics in the treatment regimen while simultaneously exploring new therapeutic modalities is critical to addressing the remaining clinical need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-world studies have a higher external validity than clinical trials, since they are deprived of the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria of the latter, and, thus, the real-world study population is more representative of clinical practice [9,10]. The robustness of clinical trial results based on strict trial design is necessary from a regulatory perspective; however, the extrapolation of clinical trial outcomes and the incorporation of the novel agents into everyday practice can be evaluated with real-world evidence [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%