1965
DOI: 10.2307/2394871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realignment of Calystegia and Convolvulus (Convolvulaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
4

Year Published

1967
1967
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Palinologicamente, Convolvulaceae é considerada euripolínica, apresentando grande variabilidade de caracteres polínicos, principalmente quanto ao tipo apertural e à ornamentação da exina (Erdtman 1952, Sengupta 1972, permitindo assim a utilização de tais caracteres para o reconhecimento dos táxons (Hallier 1893, Lewis & Oliver 1965, Ferguson et al 1977, Melhem & Corrêa 1987, Tellería & Daners 2003.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Palinologicamente, Convolvulaceae é considerada euripolínica, apresentando grande variabilidade de caracteres polínicos, principalmente quanto ao tipo apertural e à ornamentação da exina (Erdtman 1952, Sengupta 1972, permitindo assim a utilização de tais caracteres para o reconhecimento dos táxons (Hallier 1893, Lewis & Oliver 1965, Ferguson et al 1977, Melhem & Corrêa 1987, Tellería & Daners 2003.…”
unclassified
“…Além destes, outros autores estudaram a morfologia polínica da família Convolvulaceae: Laguardia (1961), Lewis & Oliver (1965), Vij & Sachdeva (1974), Melhem & Corrêa (1987), Machado & Melhem (1987), Araújo et al (2000), Leite et al (2005) e Vital et al (2008).…”
unclassified
“…The genera of Convolvulaceae were separated by O'Donell (1959) according to Hallier's aperture distinction, but at the same time he stated that pollen grains of the genus Convolvulus have the 3-colporate pollen type. Lewis and Oliver (1965) reported results that supported the findings of Hallier (1893), but not those of O'Donell (1959). Sengupta (1972) reported an exhaustive palynological investigation on the Convolvulaceae based on the number and dispersion of apertures.…”
Section: Mehmet Tekin and Gulden Yilmazmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although molecular phylogenetic data indicate that Calystegia is a monophyletic group nested within a paraphyletic Convolvulus L. (Stefanovic, Krueger & Olmstead, 2002; Carine et al. , 2004), the two genera are readily distinguished by a suite of morphological characters, notably: (1) the bracteoles that are large and either fully or partially cover the calyx in Calystegia (except in a few Californian taxa), but are small and remote in Convolvulus , (2) the stigmas that are swollen in Calystegia , but filiform in Convolvulus , (3) the ovary that is unilocular in Calystegia and two‐celled in Convolvulus , (4) the corolla that is glabrous in Calystegia , but pubescent down the mid‐petaline bands in Convolvulus and (5) the pollen grains that are polypantoporate in Calystegia and trizonocolpate in Convolvulus (Brummitt, 1963; Lewis & Oliver, 1965; Morley, 1974; Moore, Webb & Collinson, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%