1979
DOI: 10.2527/jas1979.484913x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realimentation of Cull Range Cows. I. Effect of Final Body Condition and Dietary Energy Level on Rate, Efficiency and Composition of Gains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goats in the ADLIB‐group had a lower ( P < 0.01) moisture concentration and higher ( P < 0.05) fat concentration in the muscles than those in the MAIN‐group, whereas protein concentrations in the muscles were not affected by preslaughter intensive feeding. These results agree with previous research indicating that concentrate feeding increased the percentage of lipids, but percentage of protein remained constant (Swingle et al . 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Goats in the ADLIB‐group had a lower ( P < 0.01) moisture concentration and higher ( P < 0.05) fat concentration in the muscles than those in the MAIN‐group, whereas protein concentrations in the muscles were not affected by preslaughter intensive feeding. These results agree with previous research indicating that concentrate feeding increased the percentage of lipids, but percentage of protein remained constant (Swingle et al . 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A common problem in these industries is the lack of body condition and therefore lean yield of cull cows as owners mostly dispose of cows to get salvage value and do not regard them as potentially valuable meat animals. Several studies have shown that feeding of energydense diets over short periods to cull cows could be profitable (Sawyer et al, 2004), improve carcass characteristics (Swingle et al, 1979;Matulis et al, 1987;Cranwell et al, 1996a;Stelzleni et al, 2007) and meat quality (Cranwell et al, 1996b;Stelzleni et al, 2007). However, Jones (1983) demonstrated that the improvement in carcass yield was mostly due to fat deposition with minor gains in muscle thereby decreasing the proportional yield of bone and muscle and increasing fat proportions in all major fat depots (Jones and Macleod, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method to improve cull cow quality is to feed a high‐concentrate diet prior to slaughter. Returning cows to a nourished state (realimentation) will result in compensatory growth as evident by heavier live weights (Swingle et al. 1979; Cranwell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%