2009
DOI: 10.1108/14668203200900010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realising the safeguarding potential of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: early reports from adult safeguarding staff

Abstract: Partnership means protection? Perceptions of the effectiveness of multi-agency working and the regularity framework within the adult protection in England and WalesJournal of Adult Protection 'A fourth barrier reported to affect partnership work in adult protection was time and resource pressures in relation to working together (32%, n=45)'.'Fewer than half of survey respondents (44.5%, n=56) reported there were no perceived disadvantages to partnership working'.'The most frequently cited disadvantage of worki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without the assistance of well-informed, supportive relatives to initiate hospital and local authority complaints mechanisms, who could pursue challenges to the Court of Protection where necessary, many older patients with dementia will simply be unable to instigate these challenges and appeal mechanisms themselves (Manthorpe, Rapaport, Harris and Samsi, 2009). When the onus is placed on care-recipients and the discretion of their relatives to initiate complaints procedures and challenges in this manner, those procedures and informal safeguarding mechanisms appear to be little more than patchy, arbitrary measures that fail to deliver the protection and access to justice that vulnerable incapable older adults and their families and carers need and deserve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the assistance of well-informed, supportive relatives to initiate hospital and local authority complaints mechanisms, who could pursue challenges to the Court of Protection where necessary, many older patients with dementia will simply be unable to instigate these challenges and appeal mechanisms themselves (Manthorpe, Rapaport, Harris and Samsi, 2009). When the onus is placed on care-recipients and the discretion of their relatives to initiate complaints procedures and challenges in this manner, those procedures and informal safeguarding mechanisms appear to be little more than patchy, arbitrary measures that fail to deliver the protection and access to justice that vulnerable incapable older adults and their families and carers need and deserve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the MCA may be framed as helping with advance care planning (Manthorpe et al, 2009), this paper has illuminated its important potential in safeguarding. The abilities of people with dementia and their carers to retain control of their assets and thus choices for as long as possible should be set against the risks of exploitation in its multiple forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questions asked were follow-ups of two earlier surveys of ASCs: (1) about their expectations of the MCA 2005 when it was newly implemented (2007-8) (Manthorpe et al, 2009); and (2) emerging experiences around the use of the MCA (2009-10) (Manthorpe et al, in press). Participants were recruited from London, southern, eastern, and north-west England.…”
Section: Participants and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…264 Most were well informed about it and acted as sources of expertise locally. Prior to the MCA, many SACs considered there had been a legal vacuum around decision-making.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Study Findings In Light Of Previous Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while community nurses saw safeguarding as less of a priority in their jobs during time 1 interviews 258 SACs talked about the significant impact of the MCA on their practice experiences. 264 …”
Section: Approximate Timescalementioning
confidence: 99%