2001
DOI: 10.1177/109821400102200305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic Evaluation Bloodlines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
848
0
35

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(888 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
848
0
35
Order By: Relevance
“…We developed the program theory in a step-wise fashion based on guidance in literature (16, 17, 26). We first summarized prior theory and research on the subject, then collected data on contextual factors that could affect the expected outcomes of the intervention, and finally formulated the implicit theory of the intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed the program theory in a step-wise fashion based on guidance in literature (16, 17, 26). We first summarized prior theory and research on the subject, then collected data on contextual factors that could affect the expected outcomes of the intervention, and finally formulated the implicit theory of the intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In realist evaluation, the mechanisms could be understood as the agency through which the resources introduced into the system by the program produce the outcome. However, context, in the form of the appropriate external environment (or not), is critical for the manifestation of the outcome (17). A detailed description of the intervention is provided in File S1 in Supplementary Material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluators have now become more interested in a deeper process-oriented inquiry in order to understand how complex health programmes or treatments work in the way they do (McEvoy and Richards 2003;Clark, Lissel, and Davis 2008). Pawson and Tilley (2001) claimed that evaluation is cursed with 'short-termism'. They proposed that there is too much emphasis on programmes and methods that are aimed at meeting pragmatic ends with findings that lean towards parochial concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…247,255,256 Crucially, the conclusions of realist studies are recognised to be both provisional and fallible. 257 …”
Section: Foundations Of Realist Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…236,244,257 Guided by the approach to realist inquiry adopted by Pawson,228 we address the need to develop a more subtle analysis of context by specifying four main levels of contextual hierarchy (infrastructural system, institutional setting, interpersonal relations and individual) with all but the individual level divided into substrata (see Figure 5). …”
Section: Intervention: a Distinct Analytical Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%