2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-011-6724-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic limits to computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal voltage transformers, such as inductors, require that the transformation coefficient depends weakly on the load characteristics, and that energy losses are minimal. However, implementation of on-chip silicon based inductors turns out to be very difficult 23 , so that the seek for trade-off solutions in nanotransformers represents a great challenge in modern electronics. The contact configuration proposed in [5] suggests that the setup can be used as a voltage transformer at the nanoscale, contacting the EC bottom layer to another mesoscopic system with a known I-V characteristics, such as a quantum point contact (QPC), where I QP C = G 0 T 1 V B , with T 1 being the contact transparency (see inset of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal voltage transformers, such as inductors, require that the transformation coefficient depends weakly on the load characteristics, and that energy losses are minimal. However, implementation of on-chip silicon based inductors turns out to be very difficult 23 , so that the seek for trade-off solutions in nanotransformers represents a great challenge in modern electronics. The contact configuration proposed in [5] suggests that the setup can be used as a voltage transformer at the nanoscale, contacting the EC bottom layer to another mesoscopic system with a known I-V characteristics, such as a quantum point contact (QPC), where I QP C = G 0 T 1 V B , with T 1 being the contact transparency (see inset of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%