Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques - SIGGRAPH '95 1995
DOI: 10.1145/218380.218407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic modeling for facial animation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
344
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 661 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
344
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As to the generation of facial models with anatomical structure, multilayer generic template is used [8,9,10,11]. Skin, muscle layer and skull are represented as polygonal meshes [8,9] or as volumetric elements [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to the generation of facial models with anatomical structure, multilayer generic template is used [8,9,10,11]. Skin, muscle layer and skull are represented as polygonal meshes [8,9] or as volumetric elements [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin, muscle layer and skull are represented as polygonal meshes [8,9] or as volumetric elements [10,11]. The dynamical mechanism is simulated by the mass-spring system or finite elements analysis [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models emphasized the simulation of muscle movements. They are relatively simple compared with the one developed by Lee et al [21]. Lee's model has a three-level structure of skin, bone and muscle, based on physiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, MSM was initially accepted for real-time face animation due to its well-known physics and computational efficiency. Terzopoulos and Waters (1990) and Lee et al (1995) proposed a fast simulation method using MSM with linear facial muscle model. Keeve et al (1998) presented a MSM with prismatic element, and compared the result with FEM in terms of accuracy and computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%