Reality Bites: The Limits of Framing Effects for Salient and Contested Policy Issues

Abstract

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use:Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public.If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

The 22 July Terrorist Attacks in Norway: Impact on Public Attitudes towards Counterterrorist Authorities

“…The question is what cues that are sufficiently powerful to form people's attitudes? Different group identities work as cues by providing ‘informational shortcuts that may enable voters that tend to be poorly informed about political issues to make decisions as if they were well informed’ (Bechtel et al , 686). Thus, citizens use different group endorsements to guide their decisions.…”

Mobilizing Citizens for Costly Policies: The Conditional Effect of Party Cues on Support for International Bailouts in the European Union

“…However, certain conditions render cue‐taking from the political elite less plausible. When highly salient issues are at stake, for example policy decisions with redistributional consequences, voters have an incentive to switch to systematic thinking and to form their own informed opinion (Bechtel et al , ). Additionally, negative information seems to flag an issue as important and urgent enough to require undivided attention (Kahnemann and Tversky, ; Soroka, ).…”

“…Second, the article contributes to the debate on cueing effectiveness by providing insights into the question of when elite cues do not work (Bechtel et al , ; Feldman et al , ; Nicholson, ). It uncovers relevant limitations as it finds that cue‐taking on European integration is more likely when citizens have at least moderate levels of political sophistication.…”

Effects of Issue‐Specific Political Advertisements in the 2015 Parliamentary Elections of Switzerland

“…Last but not least, the influence of parties’ issue‐specific communications on individuals is still little understood (see Bechtel et al. ; Slothuus and De Vreese ). While the framing literature has convincingly demonstrated the influence of elite frames (see Chong and Druckman ), much less is known about the effect of issue frames delivered by political parties (see Bechtel et al.…”

“…While the framing literature has convincingly demonstrated the influence of elite frames (see Chong and Druckman ), much less is known about the effect of issue frames delivered by political parties (see Bechtel et al. ; Slothuus and De Vreese for recent exceptions).…”