2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Computer Application (ICDSCA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icdsca56264.2022.9987799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization Technology of Texture Feature Extraction Algorithm of Remote Sensing Satellite Image Based on FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With three decomposition levels and a direction number configuration of (8,8,8), the feature dimension was 51, feature extraction time was 62 milliseconds, classification time without dimension reduction was 152 milliseconds, and the recognition rate was 92.56%, which significantly increased to 96.82% after using KSR dimension reduction. In four decomposition levels, using a direction number configuration of (4,8,8,16), the feature extraction time reached 81 milliseconds, classification time without dimension reduction was 178 milliseconds, and the recognition rate was 93.68%, stabilizing at 96.87% after KSR reduction. These data suggest that by increasing decomposition levels and adjusting direction numbers, classification accuracy can be significantly improved at the expense of some computational efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With three decomposition levels and a direction number configuration of (8,8,8), the feature dimension was 51, feature extraction time was 62 milliseconds, classification time without dimension reduction was 152 milliseconds, and the recognition rate was 92.56%, which significantly increased to 96.82% after using KSR dimension reduction. In four decomposition levels, using a direction number configuration of (4,8,8,16), the feature extraction time reached 81 milliseconds, classification time without dimension reduction was 178 milliseconds, and the recognition rate was 93.68%, stabilizing at 96.87% after KSR reduction. These data suggest that by increasing decomposition levels and adjusting direction numbers, classification accuracy can be significantly improved at the expense of some computational efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing methods of texture analysis have some shortcomings. Firstly, many traditional texture feature extraction methods are sensitive to noise and lighting changes, easily affected by environmental factors, which impacts the accuracy of classification [14][15][16][17]. Secondly, these methods often perform poorly when dealing with highly non-uniform or multiscale textures, failing to adequately capture the details and layers within complex textures [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%