2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ines.2015.7329736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizing changes by aspects at the design level

Abstract: The cost of a change is high, but changes are an inevitable part of software development lifecycle, which comes to be recognized under a more general term: software evolution. To mitigate this problem, an approach to aspectoriented change realization has been proposed earlier based on the idea of representing change by aspect. In many cases, software development relies on graphical modeling, mainly UML, and thus a legitimate question is how aspect-oriented change realization could be supported at the modeling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Documentation fragments that represent the same documentation phrase usually document the same domain or design property that is shared by the documented program elements [6]. Horie et al [7] likened the documentation phrases to crosscutting concerns from aspect oriented programming (AOP [8]). …”
Section: Documentation Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Documentation fragments that represent the same documentation phrase usually document the same domain or design property that is shared by the documented program elements [6]. Horie et al [7] likened the documentation phrases to crosscutting concerns from aspect oriented programming (AOP [8]). …”
Section: Documentation Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this the reader can find a better correspondence with domain-specific aspect languages (DSAL)[12] that are designed to express crosscutting concerns (aspects[46]) and thus are closely coupled with the base language.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%