2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac3bc5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reanalysis of cancer mortality using reconstructed organ-absorbed dose: J-EPISODE 1991‒2010

Abstract: The revised abstract was written in the revised manuscript pdf and word file in Step 1 and Step 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the ERR/Gy in this model was then very close to those observed in the previously cited studies [26,43] and in the latest analysis of the United Kingdom Radiation Registry of Radiation Workers [46]. In US NPP workers, the ERR per 100 mGy for leukaemia other than CLL was slightly lower (0.15; 90% CI: −0.001; 0.31) [45], whereas, in Japanese NPP workers, it was negative but with very large statistical uncertainty (ERR/Gy = −0.42; 90%CI: −5.38, 7.59); therefore, these results remain statistically compatible with our findings [44].…”
Section: Leukaemia Excluding Cllsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of the ERR/Gy in this model was then very close to those observed in the previously cited studies [26,43] and in the latest analysis of the United Kingdom Radiation Registry of Radiation Workers [46]. In US NPP workers, the ERR per 100 mGy for leukaemia other than CLL was slightly lower (0.15; 90% CI: −0.001; 0.31) [45], whereas, in Japanese NPP workers, it was negative but with very large statistical uncertainty (ERR/Gy = −0.42; 90%CI: −5.38, 7.59); therefore, these results remain statistically compatible with our findings [44].…”
Section: Leukaemia Excluding Cllsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A recent analysis of solid cancer incidence in a British cohort of 172,452 radiation workers also reported a similar statistically significant estimate ERR/Sv= 0.52, 95% CI: 0.11; 0.96) [18]. In a Japanese cohort of 204,103 nuclear power plant workers, the ERR/Gy was 1.22 (90% CI: 0.24, 2.26) for all cancers excluding leukaemia [44]. By contrast, in a recent study of 135,193 US nuclear power plant workers included in the larger US Million Person Study, the ERR per Gy (95% CI) for mortality by solid cancers was 0.1 (−0.3; 0.5) [45].…”
Section: Mortality Analyses (Comparison With External Reference)mentioning
confidence: 66%