2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020wr027751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reanalysis of Water Withdrawal for Irrigation, Electric Power, and Public Supply Sectors in the Conterminous United States, 1950–2016

Abstract: Accurately measuring water use by the economy is essential for developing reliable models of water resource availability. Indeed, these models rely on retrospective analyses that provide insights into shifting human population demands and adaptions to water shortages. However, accurate, methodologically consistent, empirically authentic, and spatiotemporally comprehensive historical datasets for water withdrawals are scarce. Herein, we present a reanalysis of annual resolution (1950–2016) historical data set o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous studies providing national estimates of public supply water withdrawal, this work compiles the most comprehensive data set considered in national water withdrawal studies. Results of the 2000–2020 reanalysis indicate significant differences in water withdrawal trends relative to previous studies (e.g., Dieter et al., 2018; McManamay et al., 2021) that appear to be overly optimistic about reductions in the amount of national average per‐capita and total water withdrawal for 2000–2015. In contrast to this previous water withdrawal trend analysis, this current work indicates that total public supply withdrawals have increased by 7.56% over the last 20 years; decreases in population‐weighted average per‐capita withdrawals of 7.77% have been outpaced by 16.65% increases in the population served by public supply system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Unlike previous studies providing national estimates of public supply water withdrawal, this work compiles the most comprehensive data set considered in national water withdrawal studies. Results of the 2000–2020 reanalysis indicate significant differences in water withdrawal trends relative to previous studies (e.g., Dieter et al., 2018; McManamay et al., 2021) that appear to be overly optimistic about reductions in the amount of national average per‐capita and total water withdrawal for 2000–2015. In contrast to this previous water withdrawal trend analysis, this current work indicates that total public supply withdrawals have increased by 7.56% over the last 20 years; decreases in population‐weighted average per‐capita withdrawals of 7.77% have been outpaced by 16.65% increases in the population served by public supply system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The county‐level CRM dataset was combined with the CDL‐derived crop rotation map and the USDA‐NASS crop planting area to estimate historical spatial distributions of tillage practices. The annual crop‐specific irrigation dataset from 1950 to 2018 was downscaled from the county‐level irrigation reanalysis (McManamay et al., 2021) and NASS irrigated cropland area survey, using the MODIS Irrigated Agriculture Dataset (Brown & Pervez, 2014; Pervez & Brown, 2010) as a base map. The annual manure N application dataset from 1860 to 2018 was acquired from Bian et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the LADWP value for less dense urban areas in the Southwest and lower fractions for wetter and/or more dense urban areas. Because consistent, spatially explicit data on sectoral urban water use, especially disaggregated between indoor and outdoor users, is limited (McManamay et al., 2021), further analysis is planned to evaluate the sensitivity of the results to different urban water demand assumptions.…”
Section: The Western Us Water Systems Model (Wwsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%