1994
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34194098609.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal of optimal hemoglobin standards for female blood donors in Canada

Abstract: This study supports the use of a higher Hb cutoff value of 125 g per L for female blood donors in the predonation fingerstick copper sulfate test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies in the past reported no significant difference between finger-stick sample and VS. 15 , 22 A large numbers of studies have subsequently reported an overestimation of Hb with capillary blood. 2 , 14 , 16 Mendrone et al 23 and Bahadur et al 24 have reported an overestimation of venous Hb values by capillary screening using HemoCue by ~7–8 g/L. Several plausible reasons have been suggested for this.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Hb Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies in the past reported no significant difference between finger-stick sample and VS. 15 , 22 A large numbers of studies have subsequently reported an overestimation of Hb with capillary blood. 2 , 14 , 16 Mendrone et al 23 and Bahadur et al 24 have reported an overestimation of venous Hb values by capillary screening using HemoCue by ~7–8 g/L. Several plausible reasons have been suggested for this.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Hb Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is in agreement with previous studies, which reported that finger stick samples may overestimate in hemoglobin measurements from Ϫ0.1 to ϩ0.4 g ⅐ dl Ϫ1 and that ear stick samples may differ from the hemoglobin concentration in a range of Ϫ0.7 to ϩ2.8 g ⅐ dl Ϫ1 . 17,[22][23][24][25] Using capillary blood samples to compare HemoCue ® and automated hemoglobin analysis, Van de Louw et al reported discrepancies of more than 1 g ⅐ dl Ϫ1 in 21% of cases and more than 2 g ⅐ dl Ϫ1 in 4% of cases. 26 In critically ill patients, Seguin et al 27 recently showed a poor agreement between laboratory hemoglobin measurement and HemoCue ® , especially with capillary blood samples and to a much greater extent for patients with edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 However, the accuracy of the HemoCue ® device is lower than that of CO-oximeters in the laboratory, and the variability is much more significant for capillary samples. 17,[22][23][24][25][26][27] In addition to these two invasive methods, SpHb monitoring is a new continuous noninvasive method of hemoglobin measurement based on spectrophotometry technology, still under improvement, for which the first validation studies were presented in 2007 by Macknet et al Although results from these authors and our studies seem to show good correlation between SpHb and hemoglobin laboratory measurement, our study clearly shows that SpHb is not equivalent to HemoCue ® for hemoglobin measurement, taking as reference the automated hemoglobin measurement in the laboratory (figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: Sphb and Hemocue ® Compared With Laboratory Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of setting a minimal hemoglobin level is to exclude anemic donors from donation, thus protecting their health [31]. A study of repeat female donors in Canada found that 67% of donors with hemoglobin greater than 115 g/l were actually iron-deficient [39]. Research is needed to evaluate the prevalence of iron deficiency among Chinese female donors to help select the appropriate hemoglobin cut-off for donation for the protection of the donors.…”
Section: Donor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%