SAE Technical Paper Series 2009
DOI: 10.4271/2009-22-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rear Seat Occupant Safety: An Investigation of a Progressive Force-Limiting, Pretensioning 3-Point Belt System Using Adult PMHS in Frontal Sled Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other five rib fractures were associated to the standard belt. These findings are in line with those reported by Forman et al (2009). The paucity of pediatric thoracic data under the same belt conditions does not allow drawing any conclusion on the ability of this adult PMHS to represent the behavior of a pediatric chest.…”
Section: Thoracic Injuriessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other five rib fractures were associated to the standard belt. These findings are in line with those reported by Forman et al (2009). The paucity of pediatric thoracic data under the same belt conditions does not allow drawing any conclusion on the ability of this adult PMHS to represent the behavior of a pediatric chest.…”
Section: Thoracic Injuriessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Using a parametric MADYMO study, Kent et al (2007) reported that there are likely different combinations of force-limiting and pretensioning belts that can decrease thoracic injury risk with no increase in forward head excursion (or with an acceptable one). Forman et al (2009) analyzed the performance of different restraints using adult PMHSs in simulated rear seat frontal impacts at 48 km/h. This study shows that a progressive force-limiting pretensioning belt can decrease maximum normalized chest compression (PT+FL: 29 ± 3%; standard belt: 35 ± 9%) and number of rib fractures (FL+PT: 10 ± 8 fractures; standard belt: 18 ± 9 fractures) when compared to a standard belt.…”
Section: Thoracic Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sets of sled test data using overweight post mortem human surrogates (PMHS) (Forman et al 2009a; Forman et al 2009b; Michaelson et al 2008) and standard anthropomorphic test devices (ATD) (Forman et al 2008) were reported, in which the subjects were seated in the rear seat. Since no test data of overweight PMHS in the front seat is available at present, the test data at the rear seat (Forman et al 2008; Forman et al 2009a; Forman et al 2009b; Michaelson et al 2008) were used for the validation of the standard and overweight dummy models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since no test data of overweight PMHS in the front seat is available at present, the test data at the rear seat (Forman et al 2008; Forman et al 2009a; Forman et al 2009b; Michaelson et al 2008) were used for the validation of the standard and overweight dummy models. The dummy models were seated in the rear seat without airbag, steering wheel, and D-ring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[56] Seat belt, airbag and booster seat Airbags and safety belts are viewed as complements to one another for occupant protection in MVCs. [57,58] Enhanced protection against vertebral column injury is needed for high energy MVCs with large changes in velocities (Delta V).…”
Section: Safe Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%