2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rearing conditions differently affect the motor performance and cerebellar morphology of prenatally stressed juvenile rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that the IS group did not show an impairment in motor coordination or resistance to fatigue. To our knowledge, only one previous study used the rorarod test in isolated animals to test motor skills [46]. Their isolation procedure took place post-weaning, and they found worse performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our results indicate that the IS group did not show an impairment in motor coordination or resistance to fatigue. To our knowledge, only one previous study used the rorarod test in isolated animals to test motor skills [46]. Their isolation procedure took place post-weaning, and they found worse performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Diverse rearing conditions also can alter the motor skills of animals and synaptic connectivity of the cerebellar neurons in a gender-dependent manner (Ulupinar and Yucel, 2005;Ulupinar et al, 2006Ulupinar et al, , 2014. While effective stress management strategies, such as environmental enrichment, induce structural spine plasticity, maternal separation or early postweaning social isolation reduces the dendritic arbors of neurons located in the cerebellum, hippocampus and limbic circuitry (Murmu et al, 2006;Ferdman et al, 2007;Bock et al, 2011;Gonzalez-Burgos et al, 2011;Mychasiuk et al, 2012;Pascual, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Behavioural tests for motor skills in PS- and EE-treated animals included the rotarod (balancing on a rotating rod), string suspension and skilled reaching tasks. PS animals across all studies showed superior performances in motor learning tasks [ 48 , 58 ]. EE however, showed differing effects, with one study showing a negative effect in motor learning tasks and reaching performance [ 58 ], and the other showing superior performance in motor tasks [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS animals across all studies showed superior performances in motor learning tasks [ 48 , 58 ]. EE however, showed differing effects, with one study showing a negative effect in motor learning tasks and reaching performance [ 58 ], and the other showing superior performance in motor tasks [ 48 ]. The major differences between these two studies were the duration of stress (G13–15 versus G14–21) and the type of stressor, one using restraint and the other using a combination of restraint, swim and mirror strength (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%