2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rearrangement of Retinogeniculate Projection Patterns after Eye-Specific Segregation in Mice

Abstract: It has been of interest whether and when the rearrangement of neuronal circuits can be induced after projection patterns are formed during development. Earlier studies using cats reported that the rearrangement of retinogeniculate projections could be induced even after eye-specific segregation has occurred, but detailed and quantitative characterization of this rearrangement has been lacking. Here we delineate the structural changes of retinogeniculate projections in the C57BL/6 mouse in response to monocular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(100 reference statements)
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the removal of the ipsilateral eye results in an ϳ8% net loss, which seems insufficient to affect cortical innervation. It is also conceivable that disrupting the process of eye-specific segregation could be a contributing factor, because early postnatal ME leads to the expansion of retinal projections from the spared eye (Lund et al, 1973;So et al, 1978;Manford et al, 1984;Hayakawa and Kawasaki, 2010); however, this seems unlikely because segregation is interrupted in both hemispheres by ME but only the hemisphere, which incurs the greatest loss of retinal input, seems affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the removal of the ipsilateral eye results in an ϳ8% net loss, which seems insufficient to affect cortical innervation. It is also conceivable that disrupting the process of eye-specific segregation could be a contributing factor, because early postnatal ME leads to the expansion of retinal projections from the spared eye (Lund et al, 1973;So et al, 1978;Manford et al, 1984;Hayakawa and Kawasaki, 2010); however, this seems unlikely because segregation is interrupted in both hemispheres by ME but only the hemisphere, which incurs the greatest loss of retinal input, seems affected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a perturbation not only reduces the total amount of retinal input to dLGN, but also disrupts the recession of uncrossed retinal projections, because ME leads to an expansion of projections from the spared eye (Lund et al, 1973;So et al, 1978;Manford et al, 1984;Hayakawa and Kawasaki, 2010). Figure 8A shows examples of coronal sections through both hemispheres of dLGN at P3 and P7 after ME at birth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously with slight modifications (Matsubayashi et al, 2008; Hayakawa and Kawasaki, 2010). Sections were made using a cryostat, permeabilized with 0.1–0.5% Triton X-100/PBS, and incubated overnight with primary antibodies, which included anti-Sox2 antibody (R&D Systems), anti-Pax6 antibody (Covance), anti-Tbr2 antibody (Abcam) and anti-neurofilament-M antibody (Chemicon).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously with slight modifications Hayakawa and Kawasaki, 2010). Briefly, animals were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde.…”
Section: Histological Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%