2006
DOI: 10.16995/ntn.443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reason vs Revelation: Feminism, Malthus, and the New Poor Law in Narratives by Harriet Martineau and Charlotte Elizabeth Tonna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most eligible age of marriage however could not be fixed; but must depend entirely on circumstances and situation’ (Malthus, 1826, II, p. 276). This was hardly a feminist utopia, but there are strands of thought on men and women here that might explain more fully how and why later nineteenth‐century women as well as men extended and borrowed from Malthus's Essay ; not just in John Stuart Mill's political economy, for example, but also in Harriet Martineau's (Dzelzainis, 2006; Dzelzainis, 2016; Heyrendt‐Sherman, 2019).…”
Section: A Comparative History Of Gender Marriage and Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most eligible age of marriage however could not be fixed; but must depend entirely on circumstances and situation’ (Malthus, 1826, II, p. 276). This was hardly a feminist utopia, but there are strands of thought on men and women here that might explain more fully how and why later nineteenth‐century women as well as men extended and borrowed from Malthus's Essay ; not just in John Stuart Mill's political economy, for example, but also in Harriet Martineau's (Dzelzainis, 2006; Dzelzainis, 2016; Heyrendt‐Sherman, 2019).…”
Section: A Comparative History Of Gender Marriage and Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%