2007
DOI: 10.1080/13875860701418198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning about Depth and Motion from an Observer's Viewpoint

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to present a logic-based formalism for representing knowledge about objects in space and their movements, and show how this knowledge could be built up from the viewpoint of an observer immersed in a dynamic world. In this paper space is represented using functions that extract attributes of depth, size and distance from snapshots of the world. These attributes compose a novel spatial reasoning system named Depth Profile Calculus (DP C). Transitions between qualitative relations invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Following these ideas Santos and Shanahan [14], Santos [3], dos Santos et al [5] presented a theory aiming at the automatic scene understanding from a robot's viewpoint. In particular, Santos [3] presents formalism capable to interpret events such as approaching, receding, or coalescing from pairs of subsequent images obtained by a mobile robot's stereo pair. In order to further interpret these image-related events, an abductive procedure was developed for hypothesizing on the possible changes that might have occurred with the domain objects that could explain the image events.…”
Section: Logic-based Scene Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following these ideas Santos and Shanahan [14], Santos [3], dos Santos et al [5] presented a theory aiming at the automatic scene understanding from a robot's viewpoint. In particular, Santos [3] presents formalism capable to interpret events such as approaching, receding, or coalescing from pairs of subsequent images obtained by a mobile robot's stereo pair. In order to further interpret these image-related events, an abductive procedure was developed for hypothesizing on the possible changes that might have occurred with the domain objects that could explain the image events.…”
Section: Logic-based Scene Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, however, QSR formalisms are independent from an observer's viewpoint, which makes them not applicable to computer vision or robotic problems. There is, however, a growing interest in the development of dynamic formalisms about space in which qualitative changes observed by a mobile robot are the building blocks of the system [2][3][4].…”
Section: Qualitative Spatial Reasoning (Qsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buscando uma aplicação com dados reais, estendeu-se com uma abordagem probabilís-tica um sistema de auto localização previamente desenvolvido em trabalhos anteriores (SANTOS; DEE; FENELON, 2008;SANTOS;FENELON, 2009). O sistema trata do problema referente ao robô inferir sua localização qualitativa a partir da sua percepção visual das relações dos elementos alvos no ambiente.…”
Section: Primeira Contribuição 77unclassified
“…Porém, também é possível raciocinar sobre sombras a partir do ponto de vista de um observador. Com o PQRS podemos inferir informações tais como percepção de profundidade e a localização relativa do observador, ambas descritas em (SANTOS; DEE; FENELON, 2008;SANTOS;FENELON, 2009). Por ser relevante a esse trabalho a seguir descreveremos somente a localização relativa.…”
unclassified
“…In previous works (Santos and Shanahan, 2002;Santos and Shanahan, 2003;Santos, 2007;dos Santos et al, 2008) we have concentrated on developing systems capable of generating explanations for computer vision data using abductive reasoning. Abduction was proposed by Charles Peirce as the inference that rules the first stage of scientific inquiries and of any interpretive process (Peirce, 1958), i.e., the process of suggesting hypotheses to explain a given phenomenon.…”
Section: Symbolic Learning Using Ilpmentioning
confidence: 99%