2012
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2012.689385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning Through Instructional Analogies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model I use here extends one that has had substantial theoretical and empirical development (e.g., Kapon & diSessa, 2012;diSessa, 1983diSessa, , 1988. I elaborate later, but offer a short introduction here.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Conceptual Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model I use here extends one that has had substantial theoretical and empirical development (e.g., Kapon & diSessa, 2012;diSessa, 1983diSessa, , 1988. I elaborate later, but offer a short introduction here.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Conceptual Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore Dole (2000) suggested that the more strongly a belief was held, the more it reduced comprehension of new material which was in conflict with the prior belief. Kapon and diSessa (2012) consider how the prior knowledge about the target affects the evaluation of the plausibility and applicability of the analogy. In Ahmed's explanation; he knows that removal of another electron results in a further increase for the next subsequent ionisation energy even if the electrons are removed from the same shell.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An issue with this AC is that it does provide a means by which increasing subsequent ionisation energies can be accounted for and as it is common for students to be asked to describe the trend, but it is rare they are asked to explain why, a spontaneous simplistic explanation which is similar to that for subsequent electron affinities offers an initial plausibility. Kapon and diSessa (2012) considered how selection of simple explanatory principles or e-prims (explanatory primitives) for use with analogies was affected by pragmatic goals, such that when prior use of the e-prim had yielded correct answers this experience would prompt this argument to be used again. This appears to be the case here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are currently qualitatively analysing the video data of the learning process. Such analysis is necessary to understand the actual process of conceptual change on an appropriate scale (Kapon and diSessa 2012). Also, this might be useful to validate the quantitative results in terms of identification of actual learning situation, where understanding might be especially fostered or inhibited according to the intervention groups.…”
Section: Learning and Testing The Energy Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others in turn might be cued or suppressed by contextual factors (for example, students tend to see springiness 3 in the context of a book placed on a spring but not in the case of a book placed on a table; cf. Kapon and diSessa 2012).…”
Section: Concepts and Conceptual Change Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%