2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22177-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning with Global Assumptions in Arithmetic Modal Logics

Abstract: Abstract. We establish a generic upper bound ExpTime for reasoning with global assumptions in coalgebraic modal logics. Unlike earlier results of this kind, we do not require a tractable set of tableau rules for the instance logics, so that the result applies to wider classes of logics. Examples are Presburger modal logic, which extends graded modal logic with linear inequalities over numbers of successors, and probabilistic modal logic with polynomial inequalities over probabilities. We establish the theoreti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This example (as well as the previous one) can be extended to admit (monotone) polynomial inequalities among probabilities (or multiplicities, respectively) instead of only comparison with constants, allowing, e.g., for expressing probabilistic independence [23,31,39]. In more detail, we can introduce n-ary modalities says roughly that if we independently sample two successors of the current state, then with probability at least 0.8, the first successor state will satisfy p, and then X again (continuing indefinitely), and the second successor state will remain on a path where it satisfies Y again until it eventually reaches q. as the monotone µ-calculus [22].…”
Section: A2 Details On Applications To Coalgebraic µ-Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example (as well as the previous one) can be extended to admit (monotone) polynomial inequalities among probabilities (or multiplicities, respectively) instead of only comparison with constants, allowing, e.g., for expressing probabilistic independence [23,31,39]. In more detail, we can introduce n-ary modalities says roughly that if we independently sample two successors of the current state, then with probability at least 0.8, the first successor state will satisfy p, and then X again (continuing indefinitely), and the second successor state will remain on a path where it satisfies Y again until it eventually reaches q. as the monotone µ-calculus [22].…”
Section: A2 Details On Applications To Coalgebraic µ-Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some decidable fragments of GF 2 extended with Presburger constraints are known. We already know that the complexity of the modal logic K or the description logic ALC do not differ from their Presburger versions, see [2,5,11]. We believe that to obtain tight complexity bounds for Presburger GF 2 one should start with a more modest goal, i.e., to establish the exact complexity of Presburger ALCI, namely an extension of ALC with inverse relations.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Similarly, we use the semantic domain from item 3., Markov chains, to obtain the probabilistic µ-calculus with polynomial inequalities [22]. Again, we introduce new higher-arity modalities by putting…”
Section: The Presburger µ-Calculus Is the Extension Of The Graded µ-C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logics from the last two items are necessarily less general than the corresponding next-step logics [7,22], because the definition of µ-calculi requires monotonicity of the involved predicate liftings. To ensure monotonicity, we restrict all coefficients to be positive, and moreover we restrict the relation in item 4. to be > instead of one of the relations {>,…”
Section: The Presburger µ-Calculus Is the Extension Of The Graded µ-C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation