2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45816-6_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning with Goal Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
207
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
207
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…), the algorithm in [3] propagates these labels up towards the root goals using the semantics of AND/OR decompositions and contribution links. Thus, this algorithm can be used to determine how the satisfaction/denial of lower-level goals affects the satisfaction of higher-level ones.…”
Section: Reasoning With Goal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), the algorithm in [3] propagates these labels up towards the root goals using the semantics of AND/OR decompositions and contribution links. Thus, this algorithm can be used to determine how the satisfaction/denial of lower-level goals affects the satisfaction of higher-level ones.…”
Section: Reasoning With Goal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The achievement status of non-leaf goals can usually be deduced using the algorithm of [3] that propagates the satisfaction values of leaf-level goals up towards the root of the model. For example, if the goal "Through VPN" is determined to be achieved, then the goal "Connect to Intranet" is achieved as well by the semantics of the OR decomposition.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, obstacle analysis [15] explores possible obstacles to the satisfaction of a goal. Along a different dimension, qualitative goal analysis [16] allows qualitative contributions from one goal to another, and shows how to formalize and reason with them. In whatever form, goal-oriented requirements engineering has been attracting considerable attention within the software engineering community [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Goals Aspects and Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis can be performed using the goal reasoning algorithm proposed by Giorgini et al [23] on the goal model restricted by the evaluation of the location properties. A strategy for evaluating satisfiability follows a top-down approach: starting from a top-level goal, we should check that all (at least one) sub-goals in and-(or-) decompositions can be achieved, or that the top-level goal can be achieved via a makes (+1.0) contribution from an achievable goal.…”
Section: Location-based Goal Satisfiability (Lgs)mentioning
confidence: 99%