Proceedings. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Industrial Strength Formal Specification Techniques
DOI: 10.1109/wift.1998.766304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning with UML class diagrams

Abstract: The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasoning on software models is principally enabled after a translation to a logic-based representation, e.g to Alloy [43], Description Logics [53], OWL 2 [54], or Object-Z [55,56]. When using such formal representations, one could reason on modelware models and formally prove properties through inference and make implicit knowledge of interest explicit [53].…”
Section: Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasoning on software models is principally enabled after a translation to a logic-based representation, e.g to Alloy [43], Description Logics [53], OWL 2 [54], or Object-Z [55,56]. When using such formal representations, one could reason on modelware models and formally prove properties through inference and make implicit knowledge of interest explicit [53].…”
Section: Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the first works in the area are that of Lano [33] and Evans [21] who both define transformations with respect to an underlying semantics of class diagrams. In both cases these transformations are not directly executable: such work can therefore be seen as specifying model transformations.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantics of class diagrams was expressed using such formal languages as Z [4,5], PVS-SL [1], description logic [2] and RAISE-SL [6]. Some of the works were restricted to the semantics of models, while the others were concerned with the issues of reasoning about models and model transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%