Reasons and Conditions for Disciplinary Offenses in the Civil Service System

Channov, Sergey; Dobrobaba, M. B.

doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201205.012

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Holding manufacturers or developers solely responsible for the harm caused by their actions is certainly possible, but hardly advisable, as the result of training in such a case becomes dependent not only on the pre-installed in it data, but also on numerous environmental factors, which are simply impossible to predict. As we know, with respect to any offense, the factors (determinants) contributing to their commission are a generalized concept, the content of which are the causes and conditions of offenses (Channov & Dobrobaba, 2020). In this context, a certain crude analogy can be drawn with the modern doctrine of crime factors, which is based on the fact that the criminal behavior of an individual is associated with both the social environment and genetic predisposition (Agapov et al, 2006;Sitnikova, 2021).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence Responsibilities: Ethical And Legal Issues

Lipchanskaya¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of the article is the analysis of doctrinal provisions, legal norms as well as the practice of their application on the distribution of responsibility related to the use of artificial intelligence between different subjects (designer, holder, owner, etc.) with determination of expediency and ways of bringing to responsibility of the artificial intelligence as a subject (or quasi-subject) of law. The responsibility of artificial intelligence systems is a complex problem, the complexity of which is due to their autonomy and the ability to self-learn. This factor makes it difficult to distribute the burden of responsibility among the various individuals involved in the creation and operation of artificial intelligence. At the same time, the modern (and in the near visible perspective) development of artificial intelligence systems does not allow one to recognize their qualities of personality and, therefore, to apply to them measures of responsibility as to individuals and legal entities. It is concluded that the solution to this problem lies in the area of supplying artificial intelligence systems with elements of subjectivity. It was substantiated that the concept of supplying the artificial intelligence systems with the quasi-subject of law status. Property ownership will allow implementing both civil law sanctions and administrative and criminal law sanctions. When developing legislation in this area, a balance must be struck between protecting the public interest and the need to stimulate scientific and technological progress in this area.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence Responsibilities: Ethical And Legal Issues

Lipchanskaya¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Under the condition of a healthy moral and psychological climate, the collective of employees of the state body is distinguished by collective cohesion, commitment to the values of the state body; the absence of unproductive competition; the absence of intra-collective conflicts; mutual emotional support (Channov & Dobrobaba, 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization Of Disciplinary Penalties In The Civil Service In The Russian Federation

Channov¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the prospects for improving the effectiveness of the institution of disciplinary responsibility in the civil service system of the Russian Federation by improving disciplinary penalties. It is concluded that the effectiveness of disciplinary penalties is a kind of an indicator of the effectiveness of the institution of disciplinary responsibility in the public service system. The study found that the most serious problems in the practice of functioning of the state service of the Russian Federation are connected with the disciplinary actions of a moral nature, the impact of which largely depends on the personality of the offender. As a solution to this problem, it is possible to combine -if necessary -moral disciplinary penalties with some additional disciplinary measures that have a material nature or restrict the career growth of an official (reduction or deprivation of monthly monetary incentives; elimination of various benefits and compensations; deprivation of breastplate badges, etc.). Separately, it is necessary to regulate the issue of establishing restrictions on the possibility of entering the civil service of persons dismissed due to loss of confidence. To do this, it is necessary to introduce a new disciplinary penalty in the form of deprivation of the right to fill public service positions for a certain period, applied as an additional one. The introduction of these changes will increase the effectiveness of disciplinary measures against offenders.

show abstract