Revolutions are swift, while evolution is typically a slow, incremental process. One of the most notable things that happened after the Egyptian 2011 revolution was the explosive uprising of youth. Regardless of the political turn of events, which is surely not the subject of this piece, it was becoming increasingly clear that something beyond politics was radically changing the academic landscape, particularly among university students. What started as a "revolutionary" interest in science and research quickly transformed into a continuously changing "evolutionary" process. As a finalyear medical student who spent half of his medical school before the revolution, and half of it after the political turmoil, I was lucky to be one of the earliest Bexperiments^demonstrat-ing the value of strong mentorship on developing an early aptitude for research. One year before the revolution, an oncology summer rotation was developed at the National Cancer Institute (NCI, Cairo University), designed to test the applicability of incorporating oncology rotations into the core medical curriculum in medical schools in developing countries [1]. I joined the course in its second year; the year of the revolution. The course instructor-who later became my long-term research mentor and is co-authoring this opinion piece-integrated an academic writing component into the rotation, as a way to stay in par with the thenbudding interest in research among the revolution youngsters. The result was a published literature review article that he and I co-authored on the very same topic that the oncology summer school addressed: oncology education for medical students in developing countries [2].I cannot overstate the importance of early research exposure and continuing mentorship on developing my character and research understanding. Three years after my initial research exposure, I now have seven published papers in international peer-reviewed journals (six of which are in PubMedindexed journals), one local and two international conference abstracts and one co-authored book chapter on cancer epidemiology. I appear as the first author on three of the published papers, and as the second author on the other four. But what is it that caused such a paradigm shift? Was it the early sense of achievement? Was I simply lucky to have gained a head start? Perhaps luck had a role, but according to our latest metaanalysis on medical student research, about one in three research projects undertaken by medical students gets published in international peer-reviewed journals [3]. Clearly, I am no special case; I am simply a case study demonstrating the untapped potential of medical student involvement in research. Project after project, I saw my research competence rise and my research confidence grow. I became more systematic in my approach to the literature, understood the importance of good planning and note-taking, became more accustomed to mining for literature Bgaps^, and gained much proficiency in academic writing.Beside its impact on my scientific produ...