1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1978.tb00644.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations

Abstract: Recurrent caries appears to be the most frequently occurring reason for replacement of amalgam dental restorations. Recent developments of amalgam alloys have improved the clinical appearance of such fillings but the possible influence on their durability is uncertain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
21
1
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies did not use approximal ledges as a failure characteristic, presumably due to the absence of radiographs. When approximal ledges were used as a criterion (Skogedal and Heloe, 1979;Dahl and Eriksen, 1978;Anusavice, 1989), results showed a lower frequency (10-32%) than that in the present study (43%). The high percentage of ledges was particularly remarkable in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies did not use approximal ledges as a failure characteristic, presumably due to the absence of radiographs. When approximal ledges were used as a criterion (Skogedal and Heloe, 1979;Dahl and Eriksen, 1978;Anusavice, 1989), results showed a lower frequency (10-32%) than that in the present study (43%). The high percentage of ledges was particularly remarkable in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Some studies (Dahl and Eriksen, 1978;Rytomaa et al, 1984;Eriksen et al, 1986) showed marginal (recurrent) caries to be the most important factor leading to replacement of restorations, followed by marginal breakdown and restoration fracture. In general, this corroborates the findings in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cross-sectional studies in the USA have reported similar results [Klausner and Charbeneau, 1985;Kelsey et al, 1981]. In Canada, the percentage of amalgam replacements because of secondary caries has been reported to be between 20 and 56% [Lavelle, 1976;Boyd and Richardson, 1985;MacInnis et al, 1991], whereas in Europe the percentages have been between 34 and 72 [Dahl and Eriksen, 1978;Mjör, 1981;Qvist et al, 1986Qvist et al, , 1990Allander et al, 1990;Jokstad and Mjör, 1991;Mjör and Toffenetti, 1992;Foster, 1994;Gruythuysen et al, 1996;Mjör and Qvist, 1997].…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Signs of intermediate remineralization processes (presence of dark zones) were most often seen in relation to the fluoride-containing amalgam. These findings arc discussed in relation to other differences between die amalgams, such as sealing property and corrosion proneness.Secondary caries is a well-known prob lem and is one of the main reasons for re placement of amalgam restorations [Dahl and Eriksen, 1978], The considerably lower frequency of secondary caries around sili cate cement restorations [Laswell, 1967] has been ascribed to the content of fluoride in these materials [Phillips and Swartz, 1957; Norman et al, I960, 1961], It has been shown that the enamel surrounding sil icate cement restorations in vivo has an in creased content of fluoride [Hallsworth and Weathered, 1969; liaise and Hals, 1976], The effect of various fluoride salts added to dental amalgams has therefore been tested in vitro [limes and Youdelis, 1966;Custer and Coyle, 1970;Jerman, 1970;Minoguchi et al, 1967;Forsten, 1976;Fazzi et al. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%