2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03457-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons to go for Rezūm steam therapy: an effective and durable outpatient minimally invasive procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, NICE reported a cost-effectiveness analysis in the United Kingdom and according to this report, Rezum is cost less than Urolift, TURP and HoLEP [13,27]. The published data of 197 patients from 15 centers in the USA showed an effective sustainable relief of LUTS secondary to BPH up to 4 years' post-Rezum procedure with no reported significant side effects [14].…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, NICE reported a cost-effectiveness analysis in the United Kingdom and according to this report, Rezum is cost less than Urolift, TURP and HoLEP [13,27]. The published data of 197 patients from 15 centers in the USA showed an effective sustainable relief of LUTS secondary to BPH up to 4 years' post-Rezum procedure with no reported significant side effects [14].…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is advised before the procedure for size evaluation and to determine the number of injections. Additionally, a prostatic nerve block may be done simultaneously [13].…”
Section: Rezum Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this procedure can be done without general anesthesia, which may be favorable for some older patients. It has also been evaluated for costeffectiveness in the USA when compared to long-term follow-up with TURP, which showed Rezum to be comparative in health and financial burden [13,14]. The literature has indicated that while clinical improvement was increased with TURP, due to lower adverse effects with Rezum, an overall reduction in cost is observed [10,14] [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If aquablation comes closest to what technology can achieve in future combined with artificial intelligence, the other aspired technique of today seems to keep the treatment in the hand of the steampunk prone surgeon in 2021. The available data off-site RCT against surgical comparator are explained by the third paper from Kevin Zorn and colleagues [13]. The group around Christian Gratzke [14] is summarising the rationale and evidence for the new MIS, namely iTIND, Urolift and Rezūm besides the shortcomings mentioned by Mark Speakerman in the above-mentioned article on certainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%