Reassessment of Consistency Criteria in Judgment Matrices

Dodd, F. J.; Donegan, H. A.; McMaster, T. B. M.

doi:10.2307/2348613

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…L4: Multiplicative scale (Dodd et al, 1992): H2: Exponential scale (Harker, & Vargas, 1987): 𝑎 𝑖𝑗 = 𝑜 𝑐 , where: 𝑐 = √2. H3: Geometric scale no.…”

Section: Research Design/methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ahp/Anp-Based Risk Assessment Customisation

Ginda¹,

Vigneshkumar²

2022

Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complex conditions of surrounding environment and a lack of reliable information about it make contemporary decisions prone to risk very much. This is why a reliable risk assessment becomes even more important today. Imperfect nature of available information means that risks can be often expressed in qualitative measures, only. Inherent merits make AHP/ANP technique appropriate for risk assessment in such the case, therefore. Note, however, that adequate risk assessment depends on the ability to address risk attitude. The attitude may deal with both risk neutrality, risk apprehension, and tendency towards risk taking. The common application of the technique for risk assessment is nevertheless based on the use of Saaty's linear judgement scale that is rather adequate of coping with a casual neutralattitude to risk, only. The development of the technique provided nevertheless alternative non-linear judgement scales. This is why their applicability for a reliable risk assessment while taking into account alternativenon-neutralrisk attitudes is discussed in the paper. Two scales which provide necessary means with this regard are finally recommended in the paper.

show abstract

“…L4: Multiplicative scale (Dodd et al, 1992): H2: Exponential scale (Harker, & Vargas, 1987): 𝑎 𝑖𝑗 = 𝑜 𝑐 , where: 𝑐 = √2. H3: Geometric scale no.…”

Section: Research Design/methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ahp/Anp-Based Risk Assessment Customisation

Ginda¹,

Vigneshkumar²

2022

Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The validity and legitimacy of the ranking created from matrices then drew criticism and the two by two comparisons of elements of the same level, greater than seven, can sometimes be complicated for specialists (Donegan et al 1992;Dodd et al 1995). The problem can perhaps be solved but making associations of assets with the same hierarchical level in spite of the resulting loss of accuracy and significance (Dodd et al 1995). Finally, the coherence of the judgement of the specialists was evaluated using an incoherence ratio.…”

Section: The Limits Of the Methods Proposed And The Potential For Upgrmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, the coherence of the judgement of the specialists was evaluated using an incoherence ratio. However, the latter was called into question because of its rudimentary aspect and lack of rigidity for low order matrices which also tended to be located at high levels of the hierarchical breakdown (giving them greater influence and range than the high order matrices close to the base - Donegan et al 1992;Dodd et al 1995) Figure 6. Zones and clusters of vulnerability shown by LISA (a) and high vulnerability hot spots (b) in Greater Lyon.…”

Section: The Limits Of the Methods Proposed And The Potential For Upgrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flood risk management centred on clusters of territorial vulnerability

Renard

2016

Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditionally, risk management has been focused on the control of hazards. However, this field of research is now more aimed at reducing vulnerability. Methodology for gaining accurate knowledge of territorial vulnerability is proposed here. It is available for all types of hazard and applicable to any territory. It is based on a census of elements at risk and uses expert weighting to define vulnerability, relying on semi-structured interviews with local stakeholders. Finally, spatial statistics are used to highlight key areas of a town with clusters of higher vulnerability. This method is applied in this article to Greater Lyon urban area, in France.

show abstract

“…Saaty lui-même (Saaty, Hu, 1998). En effet, la validité et la légitimité des rangements opérés à partir des matrices ont été critiquées (Dodd et al, 1995). En outre, la comparaison deux à deux d'éléments d'un même niveau, supérieur à sept, peut parfois s'avérer compliquée pour les experts.…”

Section: Limites De La Méthode Proposéeunclassified

Une méthode d'évaluation de la vulnérabilité urbaine appliquée à l'agglomération lyonnaise

Renard¹,

Chapon²

2010

L’Espace Géographique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Belin. © Belin. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

Reassessment of Consistency Criteria in Judgment Matrices

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Ahp/Anp-Based Risk Assessment Customisation

Ahp/Anp-Based Risk Assessment Customisation

Flood risk management centred on clusters of territorial vulnerability

Une méthode d'évaluation de la vulnérabilité urbaine appliquée à l'agglomération lyonnaise

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About