1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199803)21:3<352::aid-mus9>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessment of H-reflex recovery curve using the double stimulation procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such excitation could be caused by reafferent feedback activation induced by the substantial stimulation-evoked muscle twitch contractions and the subsequent relaxation. Reafferent feedback activation has been suggested to contribute to the facilitation of H reflexes elicited by double stimuli at interstimulus intervals of 100 -400 ms (Kagamihara et al 1998;Paillard 1959;Schiepatti 1987). Here postactivation depression and presynaptic inhibition presumably led to a longer-lasting reduction in reflex transmission when SCS was applied at 5-26 Hz, since even the larger responses within the periodic modulation patterns were smaller than the unconditioned initial response to the first stimulus of the respective train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such excitation could be caused by reafferent feedback activation induced by the substantial stimulation-evoked muscle twitch contractions and the subsequent relaxation. Reafferent feedback activation has been suggested to contribute to the facilitation of H reflexes elicited by double stimuli at interstimulus intervals of 100 -400 ms (Kagamihara et al 1998;Paillard 1959;Schiepatti 1987). Here postactivation depression and presynaptic inhibition presumably led to a longer-lasting reduction in reflex transmission when SCS was applied at 5-26 Hz, since even the larger responses within the periodic modulation patterns were smaller than the unconditioned initial response to the first stimulus of the respective train.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). When double stimulation procedure is used, it is well known that the second H-reflex is almost depressed if the interval is within several tens of milliseconds (Kagamihara et al 1998;Magladery et al 1952). In accordance with this well-known behavior, several subsequent responses were considerably depressed (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paired spinally evoked motor potentials 50-ms apart (CTI-50) were identified and categorized as the conditioning (R1) and test (R2) responses in order to investigate the neural mechanism of post-stimulation modulation [16, 22, 24]. To quantify post-stimulation modulation of the responses, the inhibition ratio was calculated by dividing the magnitude of R2 by R1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%